Re: I agree - somewhat
During the war they should have been renamed the Neo-Con blatant propaganda channel. In peace times it is a mouth piece for the Republican parties.
I'd say it is the mouthpiece for fact based analysis. If this analysis happens to conclude that the republican party is almost always right, or that the war is almost certainly right, then that is what they should report. To say it is a propaganda machine is wrong. If it were a propaganda machine, they would not present both sides of the issues, or have any liberal commentators and guests as they do.
|