Re: Your thoughts on 10/20 actually being less profitable than 5/10?
Hi Folks
Personally, I find that with proper table selection, the 10/20 games suit me better than 5/10, and I have had more success. (On party/empire, and even at UB - which never used to be the case)
I tend to be semi-loose agrressive passive (SLAP)
28VP 18PFR, and generally can find a couple of people playing 50% or 60% + VP at a 10/20 6 handed table. I play enough hands to get action, but no so many as to be too loose.
Mind you I have not played 5/10 in a while, so maybe I am just running good.
PS. I don't seem to find that TAGS (in general)do that well at 10/20. If they are multi-tabling they don't seem to defend the blinds well and when they play a big Ace they can be pushed off a pot easy on a missed flop...
These are GENERAL comments, but I find that the multi-tablers, when pressed for time on a decision, often default to fold unless you have really fishy stats. Cause we know they are all tracking......
|