Im sorry I just dont agree.
I understand that these events are unrelated, and the gamblers fallacy, but I dont agree.
The question isnt what is the chance of being dealt AA again. The question is to be dealt AA 3 times in a row.
Are you telling me you are willing to bet me with 1:1 odds that I will flip a coin to tails 3 times in a row? This is substantially different than waiting for tails to come up twice and then betting on the next flip alone - at which point the bet would be even.
Am I totally bonkers on this?
|