Re: Would you have folded AK here?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
miles I was picking through the archives last night and you were once a readless monkey as well [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
[/ QUOTE ]
I'm not saying he should automatically have reads here, I'm say he now needs to take note of their play here and use the information in the future. I made a post last night where I didn't have a read..
[ QUOTE ]
Pokertracker has just gotten sufficient hands on these two players to auto rate them: UTG+1 TPP (mouse); MP2 LPP (fish). If you'd had these reads before the hand, what would you have done differently (if any)?
[/ QUOTE ]
Those still aren't reads.
[/ QUOTE ]
Grrrrrrr. Someone did this to me, too (was it you [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]). Yes, those are reads. A read is knowledge of the playing tendencies of a player. Statitistics can give you such knowledge. Now, we may debate how sounds those reads are, yadda, yadda, but they are reads. Anyway,
"Use tells [or reads] cautiously in large pots." SSHE, p. 246.
Nak
|