[kapw7]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You're a tad loose-passive.

[/ QUOTE ]
Would it really be more optimal to have a very high AF and a low VPIP in loose-passive 0.5/1 games?
When you have the odds to limp with a less premium hand PF combined with the fact that your opponents play very bad post flop.
When you have the odds to call more post-flop.
When raising to protect your hand is ineffective. (It does work better on the turn though)
When you have no idea if you are beaten on the river with your TPTK by the calling station with pairs of 7 and 3.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your statement doesn't make a ton of sense to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Read it again.
I'm questioning a low VPIP - high AF approach in loose passive 0.5/1 games.