I know I'm a newbie and all but
I'm not all that impressed Effin. According to my PST* database, I am averaging 79 PP/100 over my last 26 posts. I know my sample size is small, but I really think I can maintain this rate and - who knows - maybe even increase it. I realize that some of the long time posters here claim that PP/100 above 50 is unsustainable, but I think my stats indicate they are wrong. Or maybe I'm just a natural. I welcome your thoughts and opinions.
*If you aren't familiar with it, PostTracker is relatively new software and is a fantastic tool for pinpointing any leaks you might have in your current posting strategies (
www.posttracker.com ). Of course, PP is your Pointless Posts/100. It is usually recorded as PP/100, but PP/hr is also a useful stat to track. It depends on your question which one is better to use.