Re: Predicting BB/100 based on other stats
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm at almost exactly 40% for full-table hands since I started tracking at the beginning of this year.
[/ QUOTE ]
Would you think that would be indicative of running well, playing well or a combination thereof? Obviously I would think combination, but is it weighted by one or the other moreso? Seems like many of the stat posts that I've seen that 30-35 seems about avg. Or is that heavily dependant on too many variables to be able to pin down?
Or am I looking at it the wrong way? (most likely)
[/ QUOTE ]
w$sf is highly dependent on average number of people that see a flop when you see a flop. 40% is not atypical at 15/30 for a TAG.
|