Re: OJ: did he do it?
[ QUOTE ]
How is he any more likely than any other possible perpetrator to have commited this crime(I mean, as far as we the viewers are concerned).
Oh yeah, the television told us he did it. The truth is, we havn't got a fukkin clue who did it. How is it any less likely that a manipulated case was built around him because he was the most likely suspect. It happens all the time. Oh yeah, the media and that circus for a courtroom told us he did it, and we're mindless sheep who believe any fukkin bullshit that's shoved down our throats aslong as it's in print, instead of simply deciding to be undecided because we weren't there.
[/ QUOTE ]
What brand of stupidity is this? Are you saying the media conspired to lie about the evidence? We had AT LEAST as much evidence to work with as the jury and could watch the whole trial as it happened. It's just that the jury happened to be full of blacks with a likely IQ of 85 (the average IQ for American blacks). One of the jurors actually said after the trial that she didn't trust the DNA evidence because she once took a pregnancy test and the result was false. Dumb jury = dumb verdict. The technical nature of the evidence went completely over their heads.
|