View Single Post
  #97  
Old 04-18-2005, 04:32 PM
maurile maurile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 95
Default Re: Is poker an ethical way to make a living?

What Business Are Poker Pros In?
Abdul Jalib
r.g.p, 1999

You can use different perspectives, without accepting one perspective as the correct perspective.

The leech perspective:

I am a leech. You won't find me sucking blood, but I do feed slowly on the money of my hosts. I don't produce any goods or services of value to society. Instead, I have to rely on those who are brain surgeons or lawyers or restaurant owners or drug dealers to go make a lot of money supplying goods and services to society so that I can make a meaningless existence off a portion of what they earn. The transfer of money to sustain my existence is very wasteful, as for every dollar I suck, another dollar leaks into ultimate leeches: the casinos and the government. The fishies would be better off without me. So would the casinos, because I take a lot of money out of the poker economy to support myself. I am a harmful parasite.

The prop perspective:

I am a prop. You won't find me on the casino payrolls, because they don't pay me anything directly - I'm not a hired prop. But I help get games started and support short-handed games, which helps the casino cardroom make money. Sometimes I'm simply the difference between the casino having N tables and N-1 tables going. My objective is to make money for myself, but many of the things I do to make money actually help the cardroom. A healthy cardroom means more money for me, so I'll even make the occasional sacrifice for the cardroom's benefit. I am not a parasite; I am a symbiote.

The entertainer perspective:

I am an entertainer. You won't find me in the Las Vegas yellow pages, but instead at the poker tables. I provide entertainment to the fishies. I even provide entertainment to my fellow professional poker players. The casino charges everyone to play. I charge the fishies even more to play with me, but the charge is hidden in the gambling, just like in the gambling games out on the main casino floor. The fishies usually suspect they are paying some extra charges on average to me, but they also know they have a shot at taking my money. And they are happy to have a game, which I help provide. I try to keep them happy by chatting with them, even talking strategy with them if they want. If they ask if I'm a professional, I'll tell them the truth. If a pot is pushed incorrectly to me, I'll push it to the fishy who can't read his hand any better than the dealer - cardspeak, after all. I can be honest and give them assistance; they are still going to pay me for their entertainment, and in the long run they'll keep coming back for more if they are happy that everything is honest. I am a good host.

The gambler perspective:

I am a gambler. You won't find me playing keno, because I'm a poker player. But I'm not making any apologies to the fishies, because sometimes I'm the fish. There is no way to mathematically prove I am playing with an advantage. Even if I'm a superior player, it's possible for the rest of the table to conspire, either intentionally or unintentionally, to make me play at a disadvantage at any time, no matter what my past track record. There is no optimal poker strategy - how to best play depends on how your opponents are playing, and it can be *impossible* for you to avoid losing on average edge against certain configurations of "suboptimal" opponents. Also, I know with 100% confidence that some players cheat, especially some that look all the world like total fish - that is one case in which I become the fish. I'm betting that I am playing with an overall edge, but it's inherently a gamble, and so there is not a sharp line between winners and losers, professionals and fish. I fear deep down I am a problem gambler.

The wise guy perspective:

I am a wise guy. You won't find me doing hits for the mafia, because I'm too busy running my own racket at the poker tables. De marks brings the monies to play cards, and I send dem home brokes, see? Dey are suckers who *want* to lose their monies. If it wasn't me to take it from them, it would be some odder wise guy to take it from them. If it takes a few moves to ensure dat the suckers lose deir monies to me before some other wise guy, well, den, it takes a few moves. A wise guy should never wise up a sucker, of course, or let dem know dey've been had. Some wise guys have a few scams dey run at the tables to get even more out of the suckers, like selling international calling cards dat don't work. I gotta get in on dat action too. I am the con man dat Doug Grant says I am.

I am a leech, prop, entertainer, gambler, and wise guy, and in that order, so I'm mostly leech and I have hardly any wise guy in me.
Reply With Quote