Re: Ideal System...Schiavo as an illustration
Neither of these "precedents" compelled the Florida federal courts to deny the injunctive relief sought in this case.
The opinion of the dissenter at the appellate court level was more compelling than the majority opinion as well as better in line with the legislative intent of the law in question.
Also, precisely what harm would have come from reinsertion of the feeding tube pending the review at the federal level that was contemplated by the law in question - i.e. other than supposedly "following the law"?
|