[$DEADSEXE$]

Ok the hypothetical is based off of every poster's wish or goal to move up over time..I.E starting at 2/4 and ending up at 15/30 etc etc.

The question had to due with the debate I've often heard in these types of post--I.E. I'm going to jump up to 5/10 15/30 etc--
The debate was over which was more profitable and less "swingy" I guess- The PP high NL tables...$200(usually this wouldn't be included)/$400/$600/$1000 or the PP $5/$10,$15/$30,$30/$60 limit tables.

So say a player is on the "path" of working up the limits but has done well enough at 2/4 or 3/6 and emmassed a big enough bankroll for $15/$30 or the higher NL tables..

Would he be better off working up to $15/$30 on a quicker than average pace or would it be better to switch to NL and work his way up $400/$600/$1000. This does take into account the players desire to play 4-8 tables to max out his hands per hour etc, and that he will only play Party and skins.

Anyways...I've heard alot of "you should just 4-8 table $400NL 6 max instead of $15/$30 etc etc....but I never hear why this would be a better option given that the player being discussed is a LIMIT player and probally is not that strong of a NL player.