Once upon a time, there were rational and coherent discussions about poker on rgp (gasp [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] )
In reading through the archives, I came across the following discussion of the beatability of low-limit games. It is of interest for the history as much as for the content. Posters to this thread include David Sklansky, Mike Caro, Gary Carson, Steve Badger, Abdul Jalib, and Izmet Fekali.
At one point, commenting on a previous post by Gary Carson, Sklansky says:
[ QUOTE ]
...so Gary is r---t about this. (Two Plus Two policy does not allow me to
actually spell out that sentence.)
[/ QUOTE ]
RGP