Re: Study: Press More Negative on Bush Than Kerry
No, I mean the study is flawed.
Why should there be an equal number of positive and negative stories on each?
Isn't this the same kind of thinking that creates those sports leagues where everybody is a winner, and everybody gets to play, and they don't even keep score?
This is the Election for the President, not the Special Olympics. We had a drunk coke head lying thief corporate puppet pawn criminal insider trader in office, running against a guy who spent most of his time on vacation wind surfing, when he wasn't saying "no comment" to the smear campaign against him.
How could the news stories possibly be balanced and equal?
The fact that the negative bias against Bush was so small, just proves how biased they were.
|