Re: what u prefer JTo or QJo? and when do u play them ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
QJo is much better. people *greatly* overvalue the "makes more straights" feature of JT. i'll take "makes a stronger TP with a stronger kicker" every time.
JTo is unplayable pre MP3.
QJo is about the same, but it can raise a loose limper whereas JTo cannot.
[/ QUOTE ]
Agreed. It is funny in the low limits how many LAGs play JTo from any position every time. It must be a long term loser.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well look at the Jones book (WLLH 2nd edition). He actually said that he found JTo to be STRONGER than he had previously thought. If I remember correctly he recommends to play it for one bet from any position.
The thing I found interesting when comparing 2+2 to Jones, is that one side found JTo to be weaker than previously thought and the other found it to be stronger. I went with 2+2 [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|