[Jim T]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Pokertracker listed it as $2900 in rake but I'm not sure how that's calculated. Been told it's not the same as we would do it for rake-back.

[/ QUOTE ]
Just for informational purposes, that number is the amount that was raked out of pots that you won. You are correct in that this is not the number used for rakeback calculations, which is probably higher if you are tighter than the average mook.

[/ QUOTE ]

Veering off post, the pokertracker method sounds like the best one to me. Why would I care how much rake was taken out of pots that I didn't win? I only truly pay rake when I win a pot.