[pokerswami]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Personally, I would prefer that you didn't mention 2+2's website on yours. I assume you intend to educate your visitors, but I would rather not give the less educated fish more knowledge. Of course, in my selfishness, I'm happy for you to help me.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wouldn't worry about educating fish. The tools for educating yourself have always been there, and most of the fish never take advantage of them anyway.

More worrisome will be the extra traffic that might come here and further add to the signal-to-noise ratio. The only other option is to open my own forum on my site, but I really would rather not do that. I don't want to steal business, so to speak, from this forum that has been so good to me, and I don't want a forum of my own until and unless I have time to monitor it closely.

Later, Greg Raymer (FossilMan)

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks for your thoughtful response.

You stated:
More worrisome will be the extra traffic that might come here and further add to the signal-to-noise ratio. The only other option is to open my own forum on my site, but I really would rather not do that.

I believe you are correct not to burden the 2+2 forums with this extra traffic.

However, it is not correct to say that "The only other option is to open my own forum on my site, but I really would rather not do that."

You have many options. Reflecting your desire not to burden the site with increased noise, you can do neither.

You do not have to mention the 2+2 forums, and you do not have to open your own forum. You can do neither, and that is an appropriate option.

(No response needed.)