Re: Was I suppose to value bet?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
we aren't going to get raised by a worse hand
[/ QUOTE ]
You aren't folding to a raise? Against fishes calling this river for one bet would be easy. Hugh pot!
[/ QUOTE ]
This is dangerous thinking. Depending on the river action, you can't expect to show a profit bet/calling on this river. If you can't fold to a raise (which I'm pretty sure the OP can't do or else he would have bet), you need to check and call.
Brad
[/ QUOTE ]
Why do we have to be willing to fold if we bet? The pot is huge and the board paired. I find .50/1 players often play much worse and more aggressive when the board pairs.
[/ QUOTE ]
Why didn't they bet after then hero checked then? A loose-passive isn't going to raise the river with a worse hand then us. If he won't even bet top pair when we check to him, how in the world is he going to bluff-raise us?
[/ QUOTE ]
It's still pretty unlikely for them to bet/raise their hand but I think it's more likely now that the board has paired.
We'd be getting about 14 or 15-1. In my experience at .50/1 I think Hero will be good easily more than 1 in 14 times.
|