View Single Post
  #5  
Old 01-29-2005, 12:13 PM
captZEEbo1 captZEEbo1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 264
Default Re: Theory of Poker-- Not to useful

Glad you've put so much into a thoughtful response!

[ QUOTE ]
Based upon that amazing amount of experience, you probably do already know everything and shouldn't expect to learn much from a book.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I know I'm not ULTRA experienced or anything, but I do feel I have learned most everything from TOP already. Is that so wickely impossible? That after reading tons about poker, through about 6 different books, and lots of time on forums and other strategy sites that I have figured out the necessary conditions for a check-raise? Is it that weird that I have figured out the power of the semi-bluff? I'm not saying that I figured out every poker concept without the aid of Sklansky, I'm saying after reading SSH, HPFAP, and 2+2 forums that there was a very little amount of poker concepts to be learned.

What part of TOP didn't I get?
Reply With Quote