[Oluwafemi]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
...was more than one "not understanding the nature of the edge in poker" needed?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it was. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Please show me why it wasn't, in order to make the same points.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll take a stab, [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img].

<font color="red"> Let 'Danielh is a moron' = nature of one's edge: </font>

Anyone who believes the above statement is true (with regard to the difference between the top current $215 playes and the top known poker players in the world), does not understand <font color="red"> that Danielh is a moron</font>, or could have, in an SNG structure. And I suspect that he/she probably does not understand <font color="red"> that Danielh is a moron </font>at large, since IMO, not understanding that <font color="red"> Danielh is a moron </font>in one poker format (after playing and/or thinking/reading about it enough), is not understanding <font color="red"> that Danielh is a moron </font> at all.

I hope this stops everyone's head from exploding.

Yugoslav

[/ QUOTE ]

actually, i'm thinking why did you need to respond in the way you did? this is a poker discussion, no need to get juvenile.