Re: Can We Hit the Lotto Again?
[ QUOTE ]
That was always my contetnion, but now I have a name for it, The utility function, I like it. I play every now and then, just for S&G's (S**ts and Giggles), but the Reward for winning far far far out weighs the $5 I spend a week on it.
ANd since the odds for the MM jackpot are 135,145,920, and taxes take out 48%, then the jackpot would have to be higher than $200,015,961.60 to make this +EV. And it has hit that high on occasion.
[/ QUOTE ]
I think this is actually pretty easy to represent in an equation.
Without the Utility Function (U), the EV equation is:
EV = -x + J*(x/p)
Where p = probability, J = jackpot value, and x = bet amount. If we take x to be 1, when the Jackpot exceeds the reciprical of the probability, you have a +EV. Since this doesn't really happen (because of multiple winning and more notably taxes), you always have a -EV.
However, things change when we consider U. Say your net income is $36.5k per year, or $100 per day (we'll say there are no taxes whatsoever on typical income). Of that $100/day, a loss of 1% of it is what we'll say the cutoff is for significance. So we have part of the utility function... that which we take from our willingness to lose a small amount of money.
Now, we need the part of U that comes from the enormous signifiance in winning a certain amount. For this exercise, we'll call that amount $1 million dollars.
So U is applicable when x <= $1.
So we can call U = J/1000000 as long as x <= $1.
Simply adding this to our original EV equation, we get:
EV = -x + J(x/p) + U, or EV = -x + J(x/p) + J/1000000
This value now becomes positive when J and p are in a certain ratio.
I think I probability messed this up somewhere, so if someone could please correct me, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks,
Kyle
|