Re: both of you are correct, but...
[ QUOTE ]
What could ever serve as evidence for or against the existence of God? I don't think we can move from empirical judgements or generalizations to a priori conclusions. In western philosophy the impossibility of proving the existence of God was accepted centuries ago; logically ("logically" in the formal sense) the same should hold for arguments for the non-existence of God.
[/ QUOTE ]
I disagree. The many false truths and presentations by the church over the years and the contradictions presented by religious literature, combined with the changing face of what truth is being defined by what best suits the people preaching it presents a decent argument against God, and towards man creating religion to try and keep control. While the above is of course not concrete, there is no similar argument for God, just blind faith.
|