Re: Seriously, I still firmly believe it is rigged . . .
might i suggest finding someone with closer to 100,000 hands? 15,000 is nothing for that kinda study.
i'm firmly in the "no way it's rigged" camp, but to fuel your particular fire... i did read, back in the day, details about a new poker site (i've long forgotten which) which claimed that due to "most" poker sites randomization equation, aces showed up a miniscule amount of the time more than kings, more than queens, more than jacks, and about tens it leveled off... but the math was a bit suspect, and they were talking about really insignificant differences, so i dismissed it (something like... an extra ace every 10,000 hands).
and no, i can offer no further information, i just remember reading it, working out some of the math, going, ummm... i think you're, wrong, and then dropping it and moving on
|