Re: can you call this?
[ QUOTE ]
I have seen some people pull this play with KTs, QQ, JJ, K9o (imagine that) just as often as I have seen people pull this play holding AA,KK,AK or KQ. I have also seen players try this holding jack diddly [censored]. You dominate the first 4 and the second 4 dominate you - you only split once every 9 times against a completely unknown player.
[/ QUOTE ]
This is flawed...even with this very, very narrow range of hands calling is in order.
K9/KT - 8 ways each - 16 combos
QQ - 6 ways
JJ - 3 ways
25 combos
AA - 6 ways
KK - 1 way
AK - 8 ways
KQ - 8 ways
total = 23 combos
This is about a narrow a range as I can imagine (and it doesn't even consider the fact that a majority of players would never play AA/KK/AK that way whereas a majority of players would play KJ-K7 and TT-66 that way.
oh, and he's getting 1.6:1.
How on earth do any of you guys get large stacks?
|