Re: How about asking the right followup question.
Thats fine and I agree. Which is why I didn't say site X is rigged, and actually I wasn't talking about Stars at all since I just don't play there.
I do take offense to someone who defends an un(in?)defensable position (both positions are un(in)defensable by the way, which is why a rash of "XX is rigged" posts happen ever 20 days or so - right now, neither side can prove anything either way so its just a giant clusterfck) coming out and saying "You're a winning player? Hah! Thats a good laugh" when there is solid, irrefutable evidence that can prove that its true. Its just stupid and rude and frankly theres enough of that in America without having to read it here.
I also dont' think its outrageous to conceive that some of the software out there, which was designed BEFORE the poker boom and before everyone and their grandma and 50,000 other peoples grandmas played poker online and when an additional 10, 20, 50% in rake would have helped keep the site alive, was designed to be less than random. I'm sure everyone believes that all the casino Blackjack and other software out there is totally 100% random too, right?
The bottom line remains, it really doesn't matter what the truth is. As long as the money is good, good players like us will be there. I just think its extremely niave to think its impossible that it could be happening (and if it is on some sites, they probably don't even know their software does that cause it was designed by someone else.)
Pack
|