Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Search Forums
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Showing results 1 to 21 of 21
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: bookish
Forum: One-table Tournaments 12-20-2005, 08:25 AM
Replies: 9
Views: 73
Posted By bookish
Re: PokerStars 25+2 Turbos versus PokerStars $55+5 Turbos

Maybe I am just running bad.

My good hands are few and far between. I've put that down partly due to the few number of players entering pots, and those pots often being stolen by a small raise.
...
Forum: One-table Tournaments 12-20-2005, 04:43 AM
Replies: 9
Views: 73
Posted By bookish
PokerStars 25+2 Turbos versus PokerStars $55+5 Turbos

Hi,

Having been playing the 25+2 Turbos with some success over recent
months (and other games at similar levels on other sites) I have recently
tried moving up to the next highest game, which on...
Forum: Multi-table Tournaments 11-09-2005, 07:24 PM
Replies: 1
Views: 35
Posted By bookish
AQ, small blind £10+1 - I played this wrong, didn\'t I

Hi,

No detailed reads as I'm new to the table. All the pots I saw had been stolen
uncontested. I've been trying to get more aggressive and get my chips in when
ahead, even if its close, rather...
Forum: One-table Tournaments 07-27-2005, 03:41 AM
Replies: 77
Views: 248
Posted By bookish
How long does the game usually take?

I'm thinking about this, but it starts at midnight in the UK (yawn). How many enter, and how long will the tourny last
(roughly)?
Forum: One-table Tournaments 07-22-2005, 04:01 AM
Replies: 13
Views: 86
Posted By bookish
How do you guys multitable

(or girls ...)

So, I've been playing the $11s on Prima (they have a mini-view and I have a cheap monitor). Just one table at a time.
Fun, but something of a grind. I've played for several months,...
Forum: One-table Tournaments 04-12-2005, 10:50 AM
Replies: 6
Views: 45
Posted By bookish
Re: I\'m really really sorry (a confession)

Its an interesting thought.

I tried it once, but I couldn't see both tables properly at the same time, so I didn't do it again.

Some of the problem may be I'm tilting having come second...
Forum: One-table Tournaments 04-12-2005, 10:40 AM
Replies: 6
Views: 45
Posted By bookish
Re: I\'m really really sorry (a confession)

I tend to play for a couple of hours (single tabling) each evening.

Sounds like good advice to me.
Forum: One-table Tournaments 04-12-2005, 10:24 AM
Replies: 6
Views: 45
Posted By bookish
I\'m really really sorry (a confession)

So I've been reading this forum (great), reading various poker books and building up my skills.

Always at very low limits, but I have been consistently profitable over about 200SNG (ITM ~47, ROI...
Forum: One-table Tournaments 03-07-2005, 10:01 AM
Replies: 1
Views: 36
Posted By bookish
Re: How do you play with a big stack

Maybe I should add this is low-buyin; 6+0.5 Turbo
Forum: One-table Tournaments 03-07-2005, 09:35 AM
Replies: 1
Views: 36
Posted By bookish
How do you play with a big stack

I've been playing and reading this forum for some time, but I haven't seen any advice on what to do if you happen to take a large chip-lead early. Now I know this is not likely
to happen with the...
Forum: One-table Tournaments 03-04-2005, 08:44 AM
Replies: 3
Views: 42
Posted By bookish
Re: rakeback deals

Have you seen this site:

Rake Reviews (http://www.rakerebatereview.com/)
Forum: One-table Tournaments 03-03-2005, 12:49 PM
Replies: 45
Views: 178
Posted By bookish
Re: Playing for Set Value

Well I agree with all that, but I can't figure out your working.

Its surely easier as (52/52)*(3/51) = 1/17
Forum: One-table Tournaments 03-01-2005, 11:53 AM
Replies: 17
Views: 79
Posted By bookish
Re: UK Poker boom update

We have lower standard of personal hygiene
Forum: One-table Tournaments 03-01-2005, 11:30 AM
Replies: 66
Views: 233
Posted By bookish
Small sample size produce pleasing results

Tournies: 37
ITM : 51%
ROI : 80%

Its a cheat I know because I won a couple of 2-table tournies and included them, and the sample size is so low as to be meaningless, but I'm still happy.

I'm...
Forum: One-table Tournaments 03-01-2005, 07:27 AM
Replies: 9
Views: 46
Posted By bookish
Re: Where to play STT

Why should the early game strategy be different?

(my guess: larger stack sizes allows for slightly looser play)
Forum: One-table Tournaments 02-24-2005, 05:01 AM
Replies: 13
Views: 73
Posted By bookish
Re: Should I move to Stars?

Where can someone find out the blind structures?
(without downloading the software, registering an a/c
depositing money and starting to play that is).
Forum: One-table Tournaments 02-16-2005, 10:28 AM
Replies: 18
Views: 88
Posted By bookish
Re: Bubble fold or all-in?

[ QUOTE ]
Don't try to do that hand by hand breakdown of what the BB might have. Just get PokerStove (http://www.pokerstove.com/) and run AJo versus a random hand.

equity (%) win (%)...
Forum: One-table Tournaments 02-11-2005, 04:45 AM
Replies: 5
Views: 43
Posted By bookish
Re: spreadsheet question

The part of the spreadsheet the you complained about, does not alter its calculations according to the number of players at the table. Other parts do.
Forum: One-table Tournaments 02-10-2005, 12:58 PM
Replies: 5
Views: 43
Posted By bookish
Re: spreadsheet question

Its because the spreadsheet assumes there are 10 people at the table, and stars play with 9. Consequently the calculation made assumes 1/2/3 prizes of 50/30/20 not 45/27/18.

The rest of the...
Forum: One-table Tournaments 02-09-2005, 05:20 AM
Replies: 11
Views: 64
Posted By bookish
Re: I\'ll share my data

You could play fewer games, but drink proportinally more.
Forum: One-table Tournaments 01-20-2005, 05:35 AM
Replies: 8
Views: 45
Posted By bookish
Re: PP, PS, UB, Pacific, PR??

I'm interested in this too. I'm trying to find a table along the following format:

+-------+----------+------------------------------+------+
|Casino | NoChips | Blind Structure ...
Showing results 1 to 21 of 21

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.