Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
07-31-2005, 01:00 PM
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 89
|
|
Forum: Probability
07-17-2005, 03:43 PM
|
|
Replies: 5
Views: 99
|
|
Forum: Probability
07-17-2005, 03:37 PM
|
|
Replies: 25
Views: 171
Re: same birthday
The odds aren't as high as you think. A birth is not a random event. Two people had to do something nine months earlier.
|
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-16-2005, 07:32 PM
|
|
Replies: 57
Views: 310
Re: Where do you rate winning the WSOP?
[ QUOTE ]
Poker is not a sport.
My vote goes to Kasparov.
[/ QUOTE ]
In chess, Judit Polgar ranked 10th in the world(in 2004). No other woman has ever been ranked in top 200.
|
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-13-2005, 12:18 PM
|
|
Replies: 765
Views: 3,056
|
|
Forum: Probability
07-08-2005, 09:56 PM
|
|
Replies: 5
Views: 84
|
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
07-08-2005, 09:38 PM
|
|
Replies: 12
Views: 73
|
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-07-2005, 11:58 PM
|
|
Replies: 115
Views: 599
Re: Simon Trumper\'s reply on ESPN
They need clocks on the tables to stop this. Allow the dealer to kill the player's hand. Use the nine ball rule. Every player is allowed to ask for a time extension once every two levels. They...
|
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-03-2005, 10:07 PM
|
|
Replies: 27
Views: 240
Re: 100 vs 6500
RETRACTION.
Okay, I'm retracting my calculations. Did it in excel, but didn't check my work.
Not clear how to treat 3 times better. But your method is a good approximation.
|
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-03-2005, 08:35 PM
|
|
Replies: 27
Views: 240
Re: 100 vs 6500
Dont need to know x,y, and z. Unless x is huge relative to z and y you got way the worst of it.
Assumption. The hundred pros dont play any better than the 6500 randoms. We know this is not true. ...
|
|
Forum: Televised Poker
05-22-2005, 10:13 AM
|
|
Replies: 67
Views: 310
|
|
Forum: Televised Poker
05-15-2005, 10:49 AM
|
|
Replies: 33
Views: 224
|
|
Forum: Poker Theory
05-09-2005, 10:14 PM
|
|
Replies: 46
Views: 290
Re: Game Theory Quiz
I first saw this execise in 1970. The purpose was to demonstrate that it was right to occasionally bluff in poker. The results of bluffing 1/3 of the time is misleading. This is a special case. ...
|
|
Forum: Poker Theory
05-09-2005, 10:39 AM
|
|
Replies: 46
Views: 290
Re: Game Theory Quiz
It's normal to give cards in order. Ace is the low card? When this problem is presented in a game theory class the three cards given as high, mid(dle), and low. No chance for misunderstanding.
...
|
|
Forum: Poker Theory
05-09-2005, 10:12 AM
|
|
Replies: 46
Views: 290
Re: Answers
Your answers are total nonsense.
Look a question 1. Why would you ever call with the duece? The duece loses every showdown.
Never call with the duece.
Always bet the ace.
Never bet the trey. ...
|
|
Forum: Poker Theory
05-08-2005, 11:56 PM
|
|
Replies: 11
Views: 124
Re: Another Game Theory Quiz
You couldn't answer Jason's simple question correctly. You have no chance of getting your complex question right. Too many variables. Two rounds of betting. Spread limit bet size. Do you even...
|
|
Forum: Poker Theory
05-08-2005, 11:10 PM
|
|
Replies: 11
Views: 124
Re: Another Game Theory Quiz
Much too complex a problem. Simplify. Solve this one.
Three card deck. The cards are high, middle and low.
Only a half a round of betting. Dealer vs. opp. Opp may bet or check. If opp checks,...
|
|
Forum: Poker Theory
05-08-2005, 09:27 PM
|
|
Replies: 109
Views: 467
|
|
Forum: Poker Theory
05-08-2005, 07:04 PM
|
|
Replies: 46
Views: 290
Re: Game Theory Quiz
1. 0(zero)
2. 0(zero)
3. 1(bet 100% of the time)
4. 1(bet 100% of the time)
5. 0(zero) the deuce cannot win a showdown.
|
