Forum: Internet Gambling
10-31-2005, 07:25 AM
|
Replies: 10
Views: 94
|
Forum: Internet Gambling
10-31-2005, 01:42 AM
|
Replies: 10
Views: 94
Re: Poker Tracker banned?
[ QUOTE ]
It explicitly says Poker Tracker and Poker Ace is fine. Poker Edge is not.
[/ QUOTE ]
Hmm, I didn't see that stated anywhere.
|
Forum: Internet Gambling
10-31-2005, 01:41 AM
|
Replies: 38
Views: 264
|
Forum: Internet Gambling
10-31-2005, 01:19 AM
|
Replies: 38
Views: 264
Re: Why does everyone on 2+2 seem to hate Party
[ QUOTE ]
Party effectively elimanated rakeback when they elimanted the skins from their network. This was -EV for everyone with a rakeback deal (most of 2+2). The fact that they did not announce...
|
Forum: Internet Gambling
10-31-2005, 12:36 AM
|
Replies: 10
Views: 94
Poker Tracker banned?
Ok, so I haven't played in over 8 months and now I am getting back into the game. When I played I used pokertracker and playerview to keep a database of my and my opponents play and display them...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-12-2005, 03:19 PM
|
Replies: 1
Views: 16
I SUCK! (no content)
Ok, even though I have been a winning player for over a year now. I now can't win sh!t.
I've decided I totally suck at this game.
Yeah, this thread sucks too. I'll say it before someone else...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 02:42 PM
|
Replies: 28
Views: 90
Re: Are you sure about those EP starting hands?
Entity, I totally understand you were trying to help me. And you were also completely correct in what you said. I am a total moron (please see post above) and you have my apologies for acting a...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 02:40 PM
|
Replies: 28
Views: 90
Re: Are you sure about those EP starting hands?
Ok, since no one here figured out that I'm a complete idiot yet. I will let you know.
I'm a complete idiot. Please disregard this post as I just made a complete ass out of myself by posting it. ...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 12:31 PM
|
Replies: 28
Views: 90
Re: Are you sure about those EP starting hands?
Just a note about this post. I want to clarify that the posters who argued for playing this hand in early position are not incorrect and this post was not made to prove them wrong. A skilled player...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 12:18 PM
|
Replies: 28
Views: 90
Re: Are you sure about those EP starting hands?
[ QUOTE ]
the problem with these numbers is that they don't tell you anything about how the hand was played...Like michael said, if the players suck they will most likely lose with these hands, but...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 11:52 AM
|
Replies: 28
Views: 90
Re: Are you sure about those EP starting hands?
[ QUOTE ]
Play the hands you want to play in early position and fold the hands you don't want to play. These hands (AJo/KQo) are right around neutral EV in early position for typical players, so...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 11:49 AM
|
Replies: 28
Views: 90
Re: Are you sure about those EP starting hands?
[ QUOTE ]
The problem with your assumption is that it is based on data that includes the statistics of a few good players, a few breakeven or half-decent players, and a bunch of terrible players. If...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 11:05 AM
|
Replies: 28
Views: 90
Are you sure about those EP starting hands?
Yes, I am going to start this topic again! /images/graemlins/grin.gif
Ok, after a very interesting discussion on playing KQo in early position broke out yesterday I decided to play around with...
|
Forum: Beginners Questions
01-02-2005, 07:57 AM
|
Replies: 10
Views: 120
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 07:54 AM
|
Replies: 15
Views: 59
Re: Ginormous pots with KK
Nobody said it was an auto-fold. I just went through this argument myself the other day and learned a lot from it. Check out this 4 page post...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 07:16 AM
|
Replies: 14
Views: 54
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 07:05 AM
|
Replies: 15
Views: 59
Re: Ginormous pots with KK
[ QUOTE ]
Why no raising the flop on the second hand? Flush draw + straight draw + overs could be coming...
[/ QUOTE ]
Because of the size of the pot he is unable to protect his hand. A gut...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 06:37 AM
|
Replies: 7
Views: 29
Re: ATs, standard?
True enough logic. Makes sense to me! Unfortunately it's not the case in this single incident. God I wish a diamond would have rivered.
Results:
BB has 3c Kc (two pair, kings and threes). ...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 06:18 AM
|
Replies: 7
Views: 29
Re: ATs, standard?
Well he was BB and it only cost him one extra bet to join the game. With 4 people in front of him already in I think its very likely he came in with Kxs.
Even if I don't put him on the king, the...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 06:06 AM
|
Replies: 7
Views: 29
Re: ATs, standard?
If he had the flush draw then he hit on the river.
Do you think I should have raised that flop?
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 06:01 AM
|
Replies: 15
Views: 59
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 05:56 AM
|
Replies: 7
Views: 29
ATs, standard?
MP1,MP2, CO are loose (over 50%) and BB is a moneybag and obviously has a K or flush draw.
I called the flop as I had a weak draw with an overcard and backdoor flush and the pot was raised...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 05:48 AM
|
Replies: 8
Views: 41
|
Forum: Micro-Limits
01-02-2005, 05:30 AM
|
Replies: 3
Views: 21
Re: A marginal hand
Got to love it when you hold 33 and everyone gives you a free turn card! Yep you played it goot. /images/graemlins/wink.gif
|
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em
01-02-2005, 05:16 AM
|
Replies: 8
Views: 41
Re: Do you value bet this river?
Ok, I got it and it makes sense now. Thanks for the replies guys! The only reason I posted this was because I was "tempted" to raise the river. Here is how it actually went down:
Party Poker...
|