Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Search Forums
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: crunchy1
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em 10-25-2005, 07:53 PM
Replies: 37
Views: 123
Posted By crunchy1
Re: preflop equity

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Like if 55 is included instead of 22, then 44 goes down even more whereas 99 doesn't by so much.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, good point. I put 44 in PokerStove against 3 hands: 77,...
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em 10-25-2005, 07:47 PM
Replies: 37
Views: 123
Posted By crunchy1
Re: preflop equity

[ QUOTE ]
That is not using our superior poker skills optimally IMO and is unnecessarily asking for big swings in bankroll. Most players go ON TILT sometimes regardless of their skill levels, and...
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em 10-25-2005, 07:45 PM
Replies: 37
Views: 123
Posted By crunchy1
Re: preflop equity

[ QUOTE ]
I don't like the idea of having to put 6 SB's into a pot to see if I can pick up a runner runner winning hand.

[/ QUOTE ]
You don't have to do anything! You are going to play poker....
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em 10-25-2005, 04:02 PM
Replies: 37
Views: 123
Posted By crunchy1
Re: preflop equity

[ QUOTE ]
I still will fold 44 and 67s though. It can still be difficult to play those postflop even if you have the equity (ie. you are not calling to the river with 44 hoping to spike your set,...
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em 10-25-2005, 02:26 PM
Replies: 37
Views: 123
Posted By crunchy1
Re: preflop equity

[ QUOTE ]
99 and JTs are significantly more playable in this situation than 44 (risk of overset too great) and 67s (increased risk of losing to another flush or 4-flush on the river; more likely to...
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.