Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Search Forums
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: Redeye
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em 02-19-2005, 02:32 PM
Replies: 17
Views: 151
Posted By Redeye
Re: Results

[ QUOTE ]
For reasons stated in my other post I think your opponent's river check was horrible.


[/ QUOTE ]

Definately... Lets change things around a bit and say hero was out of...
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em 02-19-2005, 01:52 PM
Replies: 17
Views: 151
Posted By Redeye
Re: AA River Decision against TAG

[ QUOTE ]
Haha, we're both posting too fast. Read my above post, we nearly agree. However, I don't think it's a definite thing that he'll call with KK.

[/ QUOTE ]

BTW, fun post... I always...
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em 02-19-2005, 01:50 PM
Replies: 17
Views: 151
Posted By Redeye
Re: AA River Decision against TAG

I think checking behind here isn't bad. When you're playing against good players you can't value bet nearly as much. I may be completely wrong in throwing out betting in this spot. Also, as Entity...
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em 02-19-2005, 01:42 PM
Replies: 17
Views: 151
Posted By Redeye
Re: AA River Decision against TAG

[ QUOTE ]
6 ways to have Kings, 3 ways to have Queens.

You'll pay 2 when he has Queens, and you'll get 1 when he has Kings.


[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, which would be about a break even bet,...
Forum: Small Stakes Hold'em 02-19-2005, 01:32 PM
Replies: 17
Views: 151
Posted By Redeye
Re: AA River Decision against TAG

Bet. He doesn't have jacks, he either has kings or queens, with the Q out its probably slightly more likely he has kings. Unfortunately I wouldn't be able to fold to a raise here and if you get...
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.