Two Plus Two Older Archives
>
Search Forums
Search Results
FAQ
Community
Calendar
Today's Posts
Search
Community Links
Members List
Search Forums
Show Threads
Show Posts
Tag Search
Advanced Search
Go to Page...
Showing results 1 to 7 of 7
Search took
0.00
seconds.
Search:
Posts Made By:
Buzz
Forum:
Omaha/8
11-08-2005, 11:21 AM
Replies:
27
2, 3 for low - consensus
Views:
287
Posted By
Buzz
Re: Amendment:
Chaos - Thanks. I agree.
Buzz
Forum:
Omaha/8
11-08-2005, 08:16 AM
Replies:
27
2, 3 for low - consensus
Views:
287
Posted By
Buzz
Re: 2, 3 for low - consensus
[ QUOTE ]
A/2 is sh*t with now high draw, so how can 2,3 be any better...
[/ QUOTE ]
Knoll - Are you serious? Do you really not see how it is possible for a hand with a deuce and a trey to be...
Forum:
Omaha/8
11-07-2005, 05:54 PM
Replies:
27
2, 3 for low - consensus
Views:
287
Posted By
Buzz
Re: 2, 3 for low - consensus
[ QUOTE ]
Omaha is a 4 card game...RULE # ONE. Regardless of how loose a om8 game is, 23xx rarely wins more than half the pot to show a profit.
[/ QUOTE ]
Fool - Well... you got part of it...
Forum:
Omaha/8
11-06-2005, 08:20 PM
Replies:
27
2, 3 for low - consensus
Views:
287
Posted By
Buzz
Amendment:
I originally wrote
[ QUOTE ]
There are two categories of negatives for 23XY hands, each worth either one or two negative points.
• (a) single suited is one negative point, rainbow is two negative...
Forum:
Omaha/8
11-06-2005, 08:01 PM
Replies:
27
2, 3 for low - consensus
Views:
287
Posted By
Buzz
Re: 2, 3 for low - consensus
Hi Bodie -
From your reply to Cooker, I realize you know this already, but after missing out on a nice scooper with quad treys, I think there are some ideas worth reinforcing.
Cooker wrote, ...
Forum:
Omaha/8
11-04-2005, 04:30 PM
Replies:
27
2, 3 for low - consensus
Views:
287
Posted By
Buzz
Re: 2, 3 for low - consensus
[ QUOTE ]
You don't think #2 and #5 aren't decent?
[/ QUOTE ]
Kurto - Double negatives in questions ("don't" and "aren't") make the questions hard for me to read. I think #2 and #5 are decent....
Forum:
Omaha/8
11-04-2005, 03:13 PM
Replies:
27
2, 3 for low - consensus
Views:
287
Posted By
Buzz
Re: 2, 3 for low - consensus
Hi Bodie - There’s no sharp distinction between some starting hands I’m calling playable and some hands I’m calling marginal. The same is true for the dividing line between marginal starting hands...
Showing results 1 to 7 of 7
Forum Jump
User Control Panel
Private Messages
Subscriptions
Who's Online
Search Forums
Forums Home
Two Plus Two
Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
About the Forums
MOD DISCUSSION
ISOP
General Poker Discussion
Texas Hold'em
Beginners Questions
Books and Publications
Televised Poker
News, Views, and Gossip
Brick and Mortar
Home Poker
Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
Poker Theory
Limit Texas Hold'em
Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
Medium Stakes Hold'em
Small Stakes Hold'em
Micro-Limits
Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded
Small Stakes Shorthanded
PL/NL Texas Hold'em
Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
Medium-Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
Tournament Poker
Multi-table Tournaments
One-table Tournaments
Other Poker
Omaha/8
Omaha High
Stud
Other Poker Games
General Gambling
Probability
Psychology
Sports Betting
Other Gambling Games
Rake Back
Computer Technical Help
Internet Gambling
Internet Gambling
Internet Bonuses
Software
2+2 Communities
Other Other Topics
Other Topics
Sporting Events
Politics
Science, Math, and Philosophy
The Stock Market
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
12:03 AM
.
Contact Us
-
www.twoplustwo.com
-
Archive
-
Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.