Two Plus Two Older Archives
>
Search Forums
Search Results
FAQ
Community
Calendar
Today's Posts
Search
Community Links
Members List
Search Forums
Show Threads
Show Posts
Tag Search
Advanced Search
Go to Page...
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took
0.00
seconds.
Search:
Posts Made By:
jonnyUCB
Forum:
Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-17-2005, 06:35 AM
Replies:
22
Unwise to employ higher level psychology at 200 NL?
Views:
108
Posted By
jonnyUCB
Re: Unwise to employ higher level psychology at 200 NL?
Hand 1: villian is 45/15/AF 2.0 over 56 hands
Hand 2: villian is 33/12/AF 0.7 over 52 hands
Yes GT+ does work for PS, and the table stats are pretty accurate.
Forum:
Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-17-2005, 12:40 AM
Replies:
22
Unwise to employ higher level psychology at 200 NL?
Views:
108
Posted By
jonnyUCB
Re: Unwise to employ higher level psychology at 200 NL?
Wow - didn't even notice how short I was. Yes the odds say I should call. 5-to-1 means I only have to be correct ~17% of the time, right?
Would you call this if you had 100BBs?
Forum:
Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-17-2005, 12:29 AM
Replies:
22
Unwise to employ higher level psychology at 200 NL?
Views:
108
Posted By
jonnyUCB
Re: Unwise to employ higher level psychology at 200 NL?
You are definitely right, but do you see how villian, using some level of thinking, cannot misplay his hand? I guess the same play who calls with JA here will make bigger mistakes with a bare queen.
Forum:
Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-17-2005, 12:21 AM
Replies:
22
Unwise to employ higher level psychology at 200 NL?
Views:
108
Posted By
jonnyUCB
Re: Unwise to employ higher level psychology at 200 NL?
Ive been playing 1/2 for 90k hands over ~5 months. It is easy to put villian on a hand I beat with the results there, but tell me, would you play AQ as villian did? How about a flush draw?
If your...
Forum:
Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-16-2005, 11:54 PM
Replies:
22
Unwise to employ higher level psychology at 200 NL?
Views:
108
Posted By
jonnyUCB
Unwise to employ higher level psychology at 200 NL?
Lately I've been finding it harder to get paid off on good hands and have credited this trend to the rise in overall player skill and thinking strategy amongst my opponents. As such, I often give my...
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Forum Jump
User Control Panel
Private Messages
Subscriptions
Who's Online
Search Forums
Forums Home
Two Plus Two
Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
About the Forums
MOD DISCUSSION
ISOP
General Poker Discussion
Texas Hold'em
Beginners Questions
Books and Publications
Televised Poker
News, Views, and Gossip
Brick and Mortar
Home Poker
Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
Poker Theory
Limit Texas Hold'em
Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
Medium Stakes Hold'em
Small Stakes Hold'em
Micro-Limits
Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded
Small Stakes Shorthanded
PL/NL Texas Hold'em
Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
Medium-Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
Tournament Poker
Multi-table Tournaments
One-table Tournaments
Other Poker
Omaha/8
Omaha High
Stud
Other Poker Games
General Gambling
Probability
Psychology
Sports Betting
Other Gambling Games
Rake Back
Computer Technical Help
Internet Gambling
Internet Gambling
Internet Bonuses
Software
2+2 Communities
Other Other Topics
Other Topics
Sporting Events
Politics
Science, Math, and Philosophy
The Stock Market
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
01:19 AM
.
Contact Us
-
www.twoplustwo.com
-
Archive
-
Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.