Forum: Internet Gambling
12-29-2005, 11:30 AM
|
Replies: 130
Views: 25,386
|
Forum: Poker Theory
12-28-2005, 02:25 PM
|
Replies: 14
Views: 1,147
Re: table talk
Sure pros go for every edge they can. Otherwise they wouldn't survive at that high level of competition. But this observation is actually an argument against acting like a jerk to put someone on...
|
Forum: Poker Theory
12-27-2005, 07:19 PM
|
Replies: 14
Views: 1,147
Re: table talk
I suppose character, ethics, karma and feeling good about what you are doing are out of bounds in this discussion?
Unlike a vocal minority of poker players I don't get any pleasure from berating...
|
Forum: Poker Theory
12-27-2005, 06:44 PM
|
Replies: 11
Views: 1,592
Re: TPMK type hands HU
From PokerStove:
Board: Ac 9d 6h
equity(%)win(%) tie(%)
Hand 1: 54.5% 48.32% 06.15% { ATo }
Hand 2: 45.5% 39.39% 06.15% { AA, A2s+, A2o+ }
So if your only assumption is that...
|
Forum: Software
12-15-2005, 11:02 PM
|
Replies: 17
Views: 437
Re: Video of Table Selection using PAHUD
Excession, I was really enjoying it but it stopped at about 5 min for me as well. Exact same place "aggression frequency is 50" then nada. /images/graemlins/frown.gif
|
Forum: Poker Theory
12-14-2005, 06:54 PM
|
Replies: 8
Views: 195
Re: EV of medium pp vs 2 or 3 callers
[ QUOTE ]
You want 1-2 or 5+ callers.
[/ QUOTE ]
I would have tended to agree with this, but now I'm not so sure after running pokerstove.
If you plug in limper with top 50% of hands, you...
|
Forum: Poker Theory
12-12-2005, 12:44 PM
|
Replies: 12
Views: 217
|
Forum: Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
12-08-2005, 05:34 PM
|
Replies: 9
Views: 160
|
Forum: Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
12-08-2005, 03:52 PM
|
Replies: 9
Views: 160
Re: Mason\'s article on bunching
Mason, while the concept is a useful one and I appreciate you pointing it out to me (I had never thought of it that way) your guestimate as to what it does for your odds is off, at least in your...
|
Forum: Rake Back
12-02-2005, 03:54 PM
|
Replies: 11
Views: 333
|
Forum: Multi-table Tournaments
10-16-2005, 01:10 PM
|
Replies: 101
Views: 475
|
Forum: Poker Theory
10-11-2005, 02:40 PM
|
Replies: 5
Views: 132
Re: Overpair vs Possible Set Game Theory Question
How is EP getting 1200/900? There is now 200 in the pot, EP has 956 left after his 44 call, and MP has 856 left after his 44+100 bets. If EP pushes, he is putting in his remaining 956 to win the...
|
Forum: Poker Theory
09-24-2005, 02:14 AM
|
Replies: 8
Views: 124
|
Forum: Poker Theory
09-08-2005, 02:23 PM
|
Replies: 17
Views: 265
Re: Reading hands
I think I remember an example by Brunson where he was pointing out the advantage of sometimes deliberately defining your hand for your opponent because then his betting response told you whether you...
|
Forum: Poker Theory
08-26-2005, 03:45 AM
|
Replies: 52
Views: 701
Re: We need a new word for \"gambling\"
Actually the Google definition answered the question of why poker is called gambling and investing in stocks isn't.
We use the term gambling for making a wager on a GAME or CONTEST, not because...
|
Forum: One-table Tournaments
08-22-2005, 02:17 PM
|
Replies: 117
Views: 494
Re: Heads up Theory
Jman, you are correct that the fundamental reality is that for a particular action you will win X chips x% of the time, and lose Y chips y% of the time.
In most poker situations we can predict...
|
Forum: One-table Tournaments
08-19-2005, 07:10 PM
|
Replies: 117
Views: 494
Re: Heads up Theory
Didn't see your post A_Plus before I wrote essentially the same thing. I did add the general form though, which to me seems like it would be true. Not as sure about the specific blind size...
|
Forum: One-table Tournaments
08-19-2005, 07:01 PM
|
Replies: 117
Views: 494
Re: CONCLUSION OF MY THEORY IN PLAIN ENGLISH
The theory is slowly becoming better defined as this debate goes on. It now seems to me to be:
Jman's specific hypothesis:
Since most tournament opponents stray farther from optimal play...
|
Forum: Software
08-19-2005, 12:32 AM
|
Replies: 51
Views: 384
Re: Why Compete With Poker Tracker?
Nice program, but please add some kind of SNG support. More than 1/2 of my play is with SNG's and MTT's, so obviously I would have to stick with PT if PM didn't support these games.
|
Forum: Multi-table Tournaments
08-12-2005, 07:00 PM
|
Replies: 26
Views: 391
Re: Can YOU get away from this hand?
I am curious -- I estimated that in this particular situation (2nd hour or $150MTT, 50/100, ave. stack 2400t, 300t raise called by a tight player (14% vpip), a semi-tight player (18%), and a loose...
|
Forum: Multi-table Tournaments
08-11-2005, 06:38 PM
|
Replies: 26
Views: 391
Re: Can YOU get away from this hand?
No one has recommended check-fold here. It would be hard to have the discipline to do, but I'm guessing it would be the most EV+ play.
I would estimate that in this particular situation (3bb...
|
Forum: Multi-table Tournaments
07-31-2005, 03:24 AM
|
Replies: 122
Views: 1,219
Re: *Official* Party Million Guaranteed Sunday
lol, weevil.
But seriously, don't you think that it would make more sense (+EV for you) to ask Matt - a known highly successful big money MTT player- his reasoning instead of just jumping to the...
|
Forum: Multi-table Tournaments
07-31-2005, 02:54 AM
|
Replies: 122
Views: 1,219
|
Forum: Multi-table Tournaments
07-31-2005, 02:53 AM
|
Replies: 122
Views: 1,219
Re: *Official* Party Million Guaranteed Sunday
Weevil, I don't know your record in MTT's, but I do that Matt is at the final table regularly when he enters the biggest money MTT's, not to mention a final table at least one major WPT event. And...
|
Forum: Multi-table Tournaments
07-17-2005, 10:53 PM
|
Replies: 96
Views: 865
|