Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-20-2005, 11:35 AM
|
Replies: 2
Views: 63
Re: Troublesome hand from a home game
Your format was fine -- clear and readable. The only thing I would suggest is to restate the entire board at the turn and river.
Note that the K didn't help anyone. If anyone is ahead of you,...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-16-2005, 01:16 PM
|
Replies: 7
Views: 109
Re: Strong Start, wicked twist
I don't think it is really all that clear. Your check behind on the turn is a serious show of weakness, and he might have decided that he could take it away with his 8/images/graemlins/spade.gif...
|
Forum: Brick and Mortar
06-07-2005, 01:39 PM
|
Replies: 43
Views: 344
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-07-2005, 01:23 PM
|
Replies: 39
Views: 228
Re: Set in unraised $100 NL pot - call $200?
[ QUOTE ]
Zag, your pricing of various hands is extremely interesting to me. Here you price a set at about 100BB. I remember in another post somewhere you priced TPGK at about 40BB; do I remember...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-07-2005, 12:23 PM
|
Replies: 39
Views: 228
Re: Set in unraised $100 NL pot - call $200?
Since your starting stack was over 200 BBs, you should fold. If you (or villain) had only 100 BBs, I might consider a call, and at, say, 75 BBs it would be an easy call. However, a losing set...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-07-2005, 11:14 AM
|
Replies: 4
Views: 75
Re: Hand I witnessed - Do you call this river?
This is almost the right analysis (assuming that there is zero chance that SB would do this without at least an ace). The $5.375 represents hero's share of the existing pot, which was $10.75 when SB...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-07-2005, 10:12 AM
|
Replies: 5
Views: 70
Re: Flush odds
I wonder why the earlier poster is so unlucky... /images/graemlins/smile.gif
Anyway, it is a good question. There are a few things [I started with "two" but kept thinking of more] to think about...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-07-2005, 09:47 AM
|
Replies: 13
Views: 122
Re: more river aggression on trips?
Hmmmm, no comment on the flop call, yet. You have two outs (45-to-2 longshot), you are seeing pot odds of just 4-to-1 and maximum implied odds of 95-to-1. However, you have to discount the implied...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-06-2005, 02:20 PM
|
Replies: 10
Views: 99
Re: Standard Value bet or Check
[ QUOTE ]
The question is not how often you are ahead (which is quite often, IMO) the question is how often you are ahead when he calls.
[/ QUOTE ]
You'll have to change your nick if you keep...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-06-2005, 12:54 PM
|
Replies: 3
Views: 68
Re: Overplayed my flushdraw and position?
[ QUOTE ]
The play on the flop was pretty standard, but I'd fold to the re-raise since he probably put you on the hand you had and didn't want you to draw out on him. You don't have the odds to...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-06-2005, 12:36 PM
|
Replies: 7
Views: 74
Re: Butcherd turn play- AKA- \"I\'m a pansy\"
Preflop is questionable but not terrible. The river you played correctly. It is on the flop, where you were painfully loose, and the turn, where you were painfully weak, that your mistakes...
|
Forum: Brick and Mortar
06-05-2005, 04:17 PM
|
Replies: 3
Views: 125
Where to stay in Las Vegas
I apologize if this isn't the right forum, but it seems to be the closest.
My wife and I are planning a trip to Las Vegas August 5-8, primarily to visit with family but also to play some live...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-03-2005, 02:07 PM
|
Replies: 4
Views: 69
Re: Should I push this flop?
This is a reasonable place to take a stand, which you had already decided you are going to have to do soon or be run over completely. Your pair and OESD is almost even with AA.
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-03-2005, 01:57 PM
|
Replies: 8
Views: 91
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-03-2005, 08:53 AM
|
Replies: 7
Views: 90
Re: still shaking my head on this one
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Bet more on the flop. After you call UTG+1's bet, the pot is $3.25, and you raised only $1.50. Against two opponents, you are giving KJ or J9 pots odds (never mind implied...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-02-2005, 01:56 PM
|
Replies: 7
Views: 90
Re: still shaking my head on this one
Bet more on the flop. After you call UTG+1's bet, the pot is $3.25, and you raised only $1.50. Against two opponents, you are giving KJ or J9 pots odds (never mind implied odds) to call you. You...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-02-2005, 11:31 AM
|
Replies: 28
Views: 210
Re: RESULTS
[ QUOTE ]
You keep claiming that's the same, but it really isn't. If I had the nut flush, then villain could have 22. If I have 22, then A7 is literally the only reasonable hand that beats me here. ...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-02-2005, 11:17 AM
|
Replies: 6
Views: 65
Re: A nice draw (played badly?)
You are HOPING you have a little worse than a coin flip, in which case you barely have odds to draw: http://twodimes.net/h/?z=996304
But you might be up against a set, which you don't have odds...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-01-2005, 05:06 PM
|
Replies: 28
Views: 210
Re: RESULTS
[ QUOTE ]
Ok, but playing against you I push any A on this river 100% of the time. So how is that not a leak to fold here?
[/ QUOTE ]
LOL! Because you are lying. Anyway, as I said above, if...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-01-2005, 04:56 PM
|
Replies: 28
Views: 210
Re: RESULTS
[ QUOTE ]
If you never folded here, it wouldn't be much of a leak. I just don't think it's something to worry about.
[/ QUOTE ]
I disagree. I would say that if you always folded here, it...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-01-2005, 04:48 PM
|
Replies: 10
Views: 118
Re: standard?
I don't argue with any of it, though with a really strong read hero might have made a huge laydown on the end, but it seems that he was pot-committed by then. (Entering the river, the pot was 40...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-01-2005, 04:18 PM
|
Replies: 2
Views: 63
Re: push on the river?
Note that your stacks are only 25 BBs. This means you are in a very short-stacked game, so play no drawing hands, and no crap, because the implied odds just aren't there. (In a big stack game,...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-01-2005, 03:56 PM
|
Replies: 28
Views: 210
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
06-01-2005, 01:04 PM
|
Replies: 19
Views: 153
Re: AA against 2 other players
[ QUOTE ]
someone respond. I respond to your threads.
[/ QUOTE ]
Wow, 1 hour 34 minutes elapsed between your original note and this one.
Anyway, I would have ended up all in on the first...
|
Forum: Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
05-24-2005, 12:47 PM
|
Replies: 9
Views: 120
|