Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-29-2005, 12:36 PM
|
Replies: 9
Views: 94
Re: Party 600NL 6max, bottom set turn decision
This is one of the rare cases where I'd favor a CR all in on the turn. With 3 players behind you, it's highly probable that someone will bet so you're risk of giving a free card here is minimal and...
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-20-2005, 05:34 PM
|
Replies: 2
Views: 81
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-18-2005, 04:50 PM
|
Replies: 15
Views: 121
Re: I Feel Like I Should Know How To Play This...
I like it fine up until the river push. I think the river push makes it too easy for him to get away from good but not great hands like a flopped 2 pair or a slowplayed overpair and doesn't give a...
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-16-2005, 01:56 AM
|
Replies: 34
Views: 208
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-16-2005, 01:23 AM
|
Replies: 34
Views: 208
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-16-2005, 12:47 AM
|
Replies: 34
Views: 208
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-14-2005, 05:04 PM
|
Replies: 49
Views: 329
Re: Hellmuth dogging Raymer
Phil's tournament record like TJ Cloutier's is largely pre WPT when fields were less than 1/10 of the size of modern WPT or WSOP Hold'em events. In short they aren't worth squat compared to winning...
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-14-2005, 11:35 AM
|
Replies: 11
Views: 69
Results
I talked myself into calling here because my weak reraise somewhat discounted the 3rd raise so I thought that he might have QQ here but I definitely had that sinking feeling in my guts that I was...
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-13-2005, 06:09 PM
|
Replies: 11
Views: 69
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-09-2005, 10:30 PM
|
Replies: 54
Views: 303
Re: To those reading this
Why on earth was Iceman's post being compared to Diablo's and Ray Zee's advice on a completely different situation in the first place? The situations could hardly have been more different so...
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-08-2005, 02:53 PM
|
Replies: 23
Views: 167
Re: Results
A lot depends on who the MP perfop caller is. If he's a loose player preflop who limps a lot here the CO can be raising with A8 or A9 here or 88 or 99 to isolate him with position or take the blinds...
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-08-2005, 02:36 PM
|
Replies: 115
Views: 624
Re: Simon Trumper\'s reply on ESPN
You're right, everyone should take 2 minutes before folding the 9-6 offsuit to convince the rest of the table they really had something. No one will catch on to the fact they do this every 10 hands,...
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-08-2005, 01:57 PM
|
Replies: 115
Views: 624
Re: Simon Trumper\'s reply on ESPN
You are the one who isn't addressing issues. You haven't addressed the chip leader stalling issue at all which is highly, highly relevant. You haven't addressed people playing for media time, which...
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-08-2005, 01:12 PM
|
Replies: 115
Views: 624
Re: Simon Trumper\'s reply on ESPN
Dipshit, the only reason they aren't doing is common courtesy, the thing that Trumper chucks over the side with this play. There isn't a single rule beyond the option of calling a clock preventing a...
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-08-2005, 11:52 AM
|
Replies: 115
Views: 624
Re: Simon Trumper\'s reply on ESPN
How dumb is this? Do you think the only time he takes this long of a time for a decision is when he has the nuts? There are damn good reasons why it isn't considered acceptable to do this with the...
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-08-2005, 10:49 AM
|
Replies: 115
Views: 624
Re: Simon Trumper\'s reply on ESPN
The problem is that use of this sort of move wrecks the game for everyone because if either people start to do it with any regularlity or start using the obvious counter measure of calling a clock or...
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-08-2005, 09:49 AM
|
Replies: 67
Views: 438
Re: EV wise, who do you want to win WSOPME?
Either a Raymer or a Moneymaker repeat. It would give the illusion that it's an easy game to beat and that would bring even more fish onto the tables trying to play final table move in poker into...
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-07-2005, 12:04 PM
|
Replies: 33
Views: 254
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-06-2005, 05:11 PM
|
Replies: 29
Views: 189
|
Forum: Televised Poker
07-05-2005, 06:56 PM
|
Replies: 75
Views: 387
Re: What do you say to Hellmuth?
Option #1.
Following Doyle's example, remind him that we aren't at the TV table so he isn't going to get any of the additional camera time he thinks is so precious for being an ass.
Option #2....
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-05-2005, 02:41 PM
|
Replies: 47
Views: 234
Re: Big blind 10/20 Party
This is more likely to be true against UTG than CO player however who is far more likely to have one of the draws that has you in dire shape, is correspondingly less likely to have a large pair like...
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-05-2005, 02:37 PM
|
Replies: 14
Views: 130
Re: PP NL 600 Set of Q\'s facing an ugly board.
The common theme seems to be that this isn't a threatening board and I tend to disagree but I'll elaborate.
This opponent like most good LAG's usually attacks when you show weakness or when...
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-05-2005, 01:50 PM
|
Replies: 47
Views: 234
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-05-2005, 01:45 PM
|
Replies: 47
Views: 234
Re: Big blind 10/20 Party
I agree, leading out here is the better play. Since UTG is apparently a total unknown, his most likely hand here in the PP 10/20 is some sort of pair lower than QQ, sometimes even AA and KK if...
|
Forum: Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
07-05-2005, 04:08 AM
|
Replies: 14
Views: 130
Re: PP NL 600 Set of Q\'s facing an ugly board.
The converter did some funky stuff with position of people on this one and tried to manually fix it but I missed the part you noticed.
My concern is the turn where I've obviously got at least a...
|