Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium-Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=54)
-   -   Why not to talk [censored] with the nuts. (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=393911)

Woolygimp 12-08-2005 01:30 AM

Why not to talk [censored] with the nuts.
 
(This post is purely for comical purposes, this is NOT a bad beat post).

As soon as he pushed the flop, I said," Sorry sloppy you ran into a made hand."

And this is how i'm rewarded.
[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (10 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

saw flop|<font color="#C00000">saw showdown</font>

UTG+1 ($68)
UTG+2 ($173.70)
MP1 ($120.01)
MP2 ($199.45)
MP3 ($293.70)
CO ($233.70)
<font color="#C00000">Button ($293.95)</font>
SB ($223.50)
BB ($58.50)
<font color="#C00000">Hero ($670.08)</font>

Preflop: Hero is UTG with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $1.
<font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $7</font>, UTG+1 calls $7, UTG+2 calls $7, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, Button calls $7, SB (poster) calls $6, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>.

Flop: ($37) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $35</font>, UTG+1 folds, UTG+2 folds, SB folds, Hero calls $251.95.

Turn: ($323.95) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

River: ($323.95) 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

Final Pot: $323.95

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
Hero has Kd Kc (full house, kings full of eights).
Button has 8c 8h (four of a kind, eights).
Outcome: Button wins $323.95. </font> [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Woolygimp 12-08-2005 01:43 AM

Re: Why not to talk [censored] with the nuts.
 
the converter screwed up again, theres another 250 dollars in that pot. Button pushed.

Morrek 12-08-2005 01:47 AM

Re: Why not to talk [censored] with the nuts.
 
[censored] happens, and then you deal with it.
That said, I try not to talk like this to people, it's bad karma [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Woolygimp 12-08-2005 02:02 AM

Re: Why not to talk [censored] with the nuts.
 
Well him and his two friends are probaly going to sign up under me for rakeback, so in the end I think everything works itself out. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Go_Blue88 12-08-2005 02:05 AM

Re: Why not to talk [censored] with the nuts.
 
The only good thing about this post is that it seems that you handle variance very well. I consider myself to be very good at not tilting, but a beat like that would at the very least cause me to punch something near me (like a wall, or a desk). And I certainly wouldn't be able to put smiley faces next to it...

Big_Jim 12-08-2005 03:48 AM

Re: Why not to talk [censored] with the nuts.
 
First off, you edited your post, but you didn't fix it.

Second off, . this really isn't that funny... except that you called him "sloppy."

Third off, they have a forum for this kind of post.

Fourth off, sorry about the 1 outer.

scdavis0 12-08-2005 03:56 AM

Re: Why not to talk [censored] with the nuts.
 
i seriously have no idea why idiots like you feel a need to make a speech prior to calling with nuts -- just a personality flaw i guess

you are obviously playing poker for reasons other than the money

your opponent in the hand simply ran into a very bad confrontation.. absolutely no need for such nonsense

Woolygimp 12-08-2005 03:10 PM

Re: Why not to talk [censored] with the nuts.
 
I have been playing with the guy quite a while, when your in a hand with someone your familiar with @ B&amp;M theres usually a few words exchanged.
Also, theres no need to say "idiots like you."

I've been hit twice in my poker career by hands that were less than .5% to win: Runner Runner 2 to 1 outers for large pots. Those were beats, but they happen. However this wasn't that bad of a beat, he was 4.3% to win and had significant equity in the pot.

KowCiller 12-08-2005 03:37 PM

Re: Why not to talk [censored] with the nuts.
 
[ QUOTE ]
he was 4.3% to win and had significant equity in the pot.


[/ QUOTE ]

Huh?? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

KoW

Woolygimp 12-08-2005 03:39 PM

Re: Why not to talk [censored] with the nuts.
 
Significant was the wrong word, obviously...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.