AT 4-handed, equal short stacks
 

Villain has already shown one mini-reraise where he didn't even have Ace high or a pair!

100-200 blinds, 4 people left of a Stars 6-handed $35

All four players have between 1800 and 2800 chips, hero has 2200 and villain has 2800. Hero is button and picks of ATo.

Fold, I raise to 600, villain pushes from the small blind.

Hero?

Re: AT 4-handed, equal short stacks
 

The blinds are 10 minutes. Thus it is level 6. Thus you've been playing with this guy for an hour.

If you don't know what to do here after playing with a guy for an hour, stop playing 6 handed sngs.

Re: AT 4-handed, equal short stacks
 

dude, what the [censored]. I'm presenting you with a tough decision and asking for your [censored] help. If you're going to be an [censored], [censored] off then.

Re: AT 4-handed, equal short stacks
 

[ QUOTE ]
dude, what the [censored]. I'm presenting you with a tough decision and asking for your [censored] help. If you're going to be an [censored], [censored] off then.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL

This is a tough decision because it is so read dependant. You were at the table, I was not. No one can answer this question but you, and if you can't, I feel sorry for you.

Re: AT 4-handed, equal short stacks
 

Every tough decision is totally read dependent, dude. Why give advice in any other thread? Villain is a fairly typical donkey from what I could tell.

Re: AT 4-handed, equal short stacks
 

but yeah, if I don't know what to do with my [censored] AT here, I should [censored] quit poker. Durron, you are being a [censored] prick and you know it.

Re: AT 4-handed, equal short stacks
 

[ QUOTE ]
Every tough decision is totally read dependent, dude. Why give advice in any other thread? Villain is a fairly typical donkey from what I could tell.

[/ QUOTE ]

durron's right, you're wrong. slow your roll jabroni.

you had been at the table with the guy for an hour and the only read you gave us was about what he has when he SHOWS DOWN FOLLOWING A MINIRAISE. not exactly the most worthwhile of information in this spot.

saying for instance that you felt he was a "typical player for these stakes" would be more of a read than you provided at the beginning of the thread.

Re: AT 4-handed, equal short stacks
 

Villain had not shown a single hand he had reraised with, the only reason i knew he didn't even have ace high is because I had Ace high in that situation and it was checked all the way down.

Re: AT 4-handed, equal short stacks
 

[ QUOTE ]
but yeah, if I don't know what to do with my [censored] AT here, I should [censored] quit poker. Durron, you are being a [censored] prick and you know it.

[/ QUOTE ]

And you are being a prick expecting us to know better than you when your read is "he's shown down one minraise with no pair and not even ace high".

Ok, fine, he's been shown to bluff, I call. And I bet you did too and he had you dominated, is that what you want to hear?

If you could attempt to give some idea of hand ranges, preflop aggression, whether he was TAG, LAG, Tight-passive, loose-passive, etc. that would be really helpful.

Shorthanded poker is all about the flow of the game and reads. You gave us nothing, how can we expect to know what to do here? It's not like you had AK (clear call) or K7o (clear fold).

Re: AT 4-handed, equal short stacks
 

what did he have in that spot? how often had he reraise pushed?