To agressive?
 

Do you like?

***** Hand History for Game 3034232938 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $50 Buy-in + $5 Entry Fee Trny:17403587 Level:5 Blinds(75/150) - Monday, November 14, 09:07:11 EDT 2005
Table Table 67233 (Real Money)
Seat 6 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 1: elfarge ( $1970 )
Seat 2: HERO ( $1820 )
Seat 4: pocket1s ( $455 )
Seat 6: johnjohniv ( $2185 )
Seat 8: staring_elf ( $1405 )
Seat 10: Grind4Mine ( $2165 )
Trny:17403587 Level:5
Blinds(75/150)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to HERO [ 4h 4c ]
>You have options at Table 67289 Table!.
elfarge folds.
HERO is all-In [1820]


***** Hand History for Game 3034237237 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $50 Buy-in + $5 Entry Fee Trny:17403587 Level:6 Blinds(100/200) - Monday, November 14, 09:10:12 EDT 2005
Table Table 67233 (Real Money)
Seat 10 is the button
Total number of players : 5
Seat 1: elfarge ( $2070 )
Seat 2: HERO ( $2045 )
Seat 6: johnjohniv ( $2640 )
Seat 8: staring_elf ( $1605 )
Seat 10: Grind4Mine ( $1640 )
Trny:17403587 Level:6
Blinds(100/200)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to HERO [ 9s 9d ]
johnjohniv folds.
staring_elf folds.
Grind4Mine folds.
elfarge raises [375].
HERO is all-In [1845]



***** Hand History for Game 3034242383 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $50 Buy-in + $5 Entry Fee Trny:17403587 Level:7 Blinds(150/300) - Monday, November 14, 09:13:46 EDT 2005
Table Table 67233 (Real Money)
Seat 2 is the button
Total number of players : 3
Seat 2: HERO ( $5905 )
Seat 6: johnjohniv ( $2090 )
Seat 8: staring_elf ( $2005 )
Trny:17403587 Level:7
Blinds(150/300)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to HERO [ 5s Ad ]
HERO is all-In [5905]

Re: To agressive?
 

In three words:

yes, yes, no.

Edit: your post is confusing. My answers are to the question "Too aggressive?", but your post begins with "Do you like?", in which case my answers would be no, no, yes.

Re: To agressive?
 

do i like?

No
Yes
Yes

Re: To agressive?
 

[ QUOTE ]
do i like?

No
Yes
Yes

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: To agressive?
 

Why push in Hand 1 when you have 12 BB's and a hand, that if called, will be a coinflip at best?

Hands 2 and 3 are fine.

Re: To agressive?
 

OK I can see that it can be confusing!

Then my only question is: Do you like?

And yes, I don't know why I pushed 44, that was to agressive for sure..

Re: To agressive?
 

do you like?

1) no
2) depends, usually ok
3) yes

Re: To agressive?
 

I was also most unsecure on the 2 first hands.. But they actually both turned out good. Whereas the last last one turned out bad, but hey, that poker!

Re: To agressive?
 

[ QUOTE ]
do i like?

No
Yes
Yes

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed, with the slight mantra that 2 is a bit read-dependent. As usual.

Re: To agressive?
 

I think the last hand could look ALMOST something like this:
(I might fold bottom 20%)


***** Hand History for Game 3034242383 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $50 Buy-in + $5 Entry Fee Trny:17403587 Level:7 Blinds(150/300) - Monday, November 14, 09:13:46 EDT 2005
Table Table 67233 (Real Money)
Seat 2 is the button
Total number of players : 3
Seat 2: HERO ( $5905 )
Seat 6: johnjohniv ( $2090 )
Seat 8: staring_elf ( $2005 )
Trny:17403587 Level:7
Blinds(150/300)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to HERO [ xx xx ]
HERO is all-In [5905]

You can afford to get called once and lose, but they both have to tighten up being equal and everything.


And as for the 99 being read dependant, what read would you need to have?

SB doesn't really steal and has a pocket pair bigger than 9s in order to fold this? I think pushing here, would be so good for you. Villian would be calling usually getting into a coinflip at best. And it would be his decision to flip, not yours. (in a sense)