Too Loose on the Small Streets?
 

Third hand at the table, so no individual reads. Lobby listed the Plrs/Flop at 70% though.

I'm pretty sure the over-limp is okay, so mainly wondering whether people call this flop. I realize all I've got is the backdoor straight draw a lot of the time, but he should have AK pretty often and I have something like seven outs then.

Pacific $2/$4 Limit Hold'em

Dealt to Hero [ Qc Jh ]
3 folds.
MP calls [$2].
MP2 calls [$2].
2 folds.
Hero calls [$2].
SB folds.
BB raises [$2].
MP calls [$2].
MP2 calls [$2].
Hero calls [$2].

** Dealing Flop ** [ 3c, 2s, 10h ]
BB bets [$2].
MP folds.
MP2 calls [$2].
Hero calls [$2].

** Dealing Turn ** [ 9d ]
BB bets [$4].
MP2 calls [$4].
Hero calls [$4].

** Dealing River ** [ Jc ]
BB bets [$4].
MP2 folds.
Hero calls [$4].

Scott

Re: Too Loose on the Small Streets?
 

It looks good to me.

Re: Too Loose on the Small Streets?
 

Even at 10:1 I fold the flop most of the time without a read. [ QUOTE ]
BD as 1-1.5.

[/ QUOTE ]

Forgot about this. Make the call, nice hand.

Re: Too Loose on the Small Streets?
 

I probly make the flop call. 10:1 is right on the take one off borderline if you count your overs as 3 outs and your BD as 1-1.5. I think this is one of those loose flop call scenarios.

Re: Too Loose on the Small Streets?
 

If this is anything like my local loose/passive 4/8 live game, I raise on the button here, which buys me a free showdown at least 80% of the time. If there's any chance I'll be played back at on the flop though (if BB is aggressive), obviously I either want to take one off or fold, leaning toward a fold.

With no reads though, you might assume a raise out of the BB tends to mean more aggression and/or a bigger hand than a standard raise, and you might be better off folding here.