Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   Another winrate thread (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=371053)

AceHiStation 11-03-2005 12:37 PM

Another winrate thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
A Winrate of 2.96PTBB/100 Hands
$355/hr @ 300hands/hr

[/ QUOTE ]
Taken from www.splashpots.com


I guess my question is, how does this compare to the 5/10 game, the 6/10 game?

I have never played enough hands at a limit to be able to see my true winrate. I had been bouncing around a bit mainly due to a lack of a bankroll. I got 3rd in a party super in August and took one down about a month ago. I now am overrolled for the games I have been used to playing. I played the 3/6 short-handed game for a mere 17,000 hands and felt I was dominating it hard enough(6.78PTBB/100) that I could take a shot at the 5/10 SH game. I now have a mere 5,300 hands at 5/10 SH with an inflated 8.51BB/100 winrate.

I guess my question is, what is the best known winrate at the 3/6 level, 5/10 level, 10/20 levels? I'd also love to hear winrates of fellow 2+2ers and how many hands they've recorded at that level. If you don't feel comfortable telling the whole world, I would love a PM if you don't mind. Just curious to see what I'm getting myself into. 3 months ago my bankroll was $2,000 and since then I've multiplied that by over 30 times.

Thanks in advance for dealing with another winrate thread,
-Ace

Yeti 11-03-2005 12:48 PM

Re: Another winrate thread
 
Happy to help!

KaneKungFu123 11-03-2005 01:02 PM

Re: Another winrate thread
 
i was at 3.6/180K if that helps, and 8.5 after first 30K hands.

edge 11-03-2005 01:18 PM

Re: Another winrate thread
 
I don't think 8-10 PTBB/100 at 5/10 short is unreasonable.

Rocaix 11-03-2005 01:48 PM

Re: Another winrate thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think 8-10 PTBB/100 at 5/10 short is unreasonable.

[/ QUOTE ]

It is, over the long term.

fsuplayer 11-03-2005 02:01 PM

Re: Another winrate thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think 8-10 PTBB/100 at 5/10 short is unreasonable.

[/ QUOTE ]

It is, over the long term.

[/ QUOTE ]

HoldEmKillah 11-03-2005 02:19 PM

Re: Another winrate thread
 
Kane,

Is that all? Seems kinda low for a player of your ability. Not doubting your ability...I just thought your #'s would be higher.

Yeti 11-03-2005 02:20 PM

Re: Another winrate thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
Kane,

Is that all? Seems kinda low for a player of your ability. Not doubting your ability...I just thought your #'s would be higher.

[/ QUOTE ]

Heh. 'Kinda low' compared to what? 10/20 is a lot harder than 5/10.

KaneKungFu123 11-03-2005 02:25 PM

Re: Another winrate thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
Kane,

Is that all? Seems kinda low for a player of your ability. Not doubting your ability...I just thought your #'s would be higher.

[/ QUOTE ]

T I L T

scdavis0 11-03-2005 02:27 PM

Re: Another winrate thread
 
I think it seems a bit low considering a strong player can 8 table the 1/2 6 max on 1/20th the bankroll and variance for around $180/hr.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.