Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Other Other Topics (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   Republicans protecting the Fuhrer (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=36763)

Parmenides 06-11-2003 04:06 PM

Republicans protecting the Fuhrer
 
Senate Republicans refused to hold public hearings once again on the obvious manipulation of the media and intelligence prior to "The War to give Iraq to Halliburton."

This isn't any different from 9-11.
The truth is that both Bush and the CIA knew by December, 2002 that Iraq had no WMD. This is common knowledge in intelligenc circles. It is also quite well known that 9-11 terrorist Atta received 100k from Pakistan's ISI the week before 9-11, that Bush had a dossier on his desk on 9-6 detailing the method of attack, that the FBI stopped honest agents from stopping 9-11, that military aircraft that would normally tail hijacked planes were told not to, in other words that the true planners of 9-11 work for the US intelligence community.

With Republican majorities, the goose stepping will resume again shortly.

Dr Wogga 06-12-2003 12:18 PM

Have You Had Your Kool-aid Checked Recently.....
 
.....love your "facts" bozo. Let me see if I have this straight, because the good Dr loves the nuttiness. The president and the CIA made a conscious effort to allow 9-11 to happen and knew exactly what would transpire on 9-6? If so, this is more ridiculous than Michael Jackson's explanation as to why a 44 year old man climbs into bed with little boys that he invites to sleep-overs.
Hmmm - I think I have it figured out - you are Caullie McCaulken. What a dork

Ray Zee 06-12-2003 03:50 PM

Re: Republicans protecting the Fuhrer
 
great. two posts from our farthest out extreme wackiest posters on the site. but this time the doc is a little more with his feet on the ground.

jokerswild 06-12-2003 07:34 PM

Re: Republicans protecting the Fuhrer
 
Actually, if you follow the news most of the above post is true.
1. It is standard military procedure, and has been, to tail hijacked planes. It wasn't done on 9-11.
2. Pakistani Intelligence did fund Atta.
3. Bush was warned prior to 9-11 by the Russians that Islamic militants planned to use hijacked planes as bombs.
4. The Arizona FBI agent, and those in Minnesota that had the 20th hijacker in jail prior to 9-11, attempted to alert the administration. Their superiors were promoted after squashing the effort.
5. George Bush on the morning of 9-11 listened to little kids read in Florida well after his aides informed him that the USA was under attack
6. Historically one of the largest shareholders of Presser industries, acquired by Halliburton under Cheney's command, was the Bush family.
7. Several CIA analysts were quoted in 12-02 stating that the Bush Admin pressured them to supply information favorable to invasion. These articles were covered mostly regarding the CIA's spat with Rumsfield's new intelligence department.

I do agree that Dr.Wogga never merits a response.
All of this information is available from standard news services with simple searches for past columns.

Choven 06-12-2003 07:41 PM

Re: Republicans protecting the Fuhrer
 
Using the general media is where you went wrong. There are memos about everything in every government office that will be found by the media and manipulated to express their viewpoint. The reasoning and explanation you provided are like saying that "it was obvious Moneymaker would have won the WSOP based on his past experience".

jokerswild 06-14-2003 09:21 AM

Re: Republicans protecting the Fuhrer
 
Some people can't handle the truth. Generally they benefit from the status quo. In Nazi Germany they said they didn't know, even while they watched the pogroms in progress.

Wogga is an idiot. Ray Zee appears reasonable most of the time. I don't take him to be a fool by any means. Still, the GCA probably has touched on some realistic aspects of his career.

Jimbo 06-14-2003 12:24 PM

For Parmenides and jokerswild
 
Found an intersting article describing the democrat party.

Democrats or ???

Cyrus 06-14-2003 09:58 PM

Democrats = Nazis ?
 
Thanks, Jimbo. Your link takes us to a Washington Times article so we know we are in for some entertainment. True to form, the author takes pains to prove that the Republicans are nothing like the German Nazis (hey, we believe you, man!) and then gives us the punch line :

[drum roll] I remember the Nazis and they weren't Republicans! They were socialist monsters very much like the Democratic Party of the United States of America is today.

[cymbal CRASH!]

Jimbo 06-14-2003 10:24 PM

Re: Democrats = Nazis ?
 
You are welcome Cyrus. Since you enjoyed that one so much I have another. [img]/forums/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

The Ant and the Grasshopper

Cyrus 06-15-2003 04:50 AM

NationalSocialist Democrats
 
Thanks again, Jimbo. I have bookmarked the freedomrider website as a Favorite (yes, in the Humor folder, how did you guess?)...

Since we are on the subject of wiseness, I'd want one last piece of ass
istance from you, namely when is the last time that the filthy treasonous Nazi socialists masquerading as the Democratic Party of the U.S. has proposed to nationalise anything?

All the best.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.