Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   Isn't 60% a low win rate for HU? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=360903)

Indiana 10-19-2005 01:39 PM

Isn\'t 60% a low win rate for HU?
 
Over the long run I have a 60% win rate in the 20s and 50s heads up matches on stars. Recently as I have been clogging some leaks and reworking my game I am at over 70%. Is it possible that a true heads up master could retain such a rate over thousands of games? Keep in mind I'm playing on stars with deep stacks and I am better than avg at hand reading and getting into my opps head.

Thanks,

Indy

kyro 10-19-2005 01:41 PM

Re: Isn\'t 60% a low win rate for HU?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I am better than avg at hand reading and getting into my opps head.


[/ QUOTE ]

Of course you are. In which case, you should be winning 95% of the time.

Indiana 10-19-2005 01:53 PM

Re: Isn\'t 60% a low win rate for HU?
 
This is a pretty serious post. Actually I have been over 70% while parlaying the heads up game with a SNG or MTT at the same time. I truly "believe" that I could crush my opponent better than 75% of the time if I put myself to it, I just don't have the data to back up this "belief."

Indy

Iamafish 10-19-2005 01:59 PM

Re: Isn\'t 60% a low win rate for HU?
 
Get the data, and THEN you'll know.

EDIT: Serously, if what you heard was 60% for a good player, then instead of asking just play and find out for yourself.

Also, at a 75% ROI, wouldnt you need to win like 95% of the time. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

citanul 10-19-2005 02:55 PM

Re: Isn\'t 60% a low win rate for HU?
 
it depends on a lot of things i think, but i think that at the lower stakes games %s over 65% or so are probably quite doable.

more later, busy here, just wanted to chime in. and oh yeah, vote!

MegaBet 10-19-2005 02:57 PM

Re: Isn\'t 60% a low win rate for HU?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I truly "believe" that I could crush my opponent better than 75% of the time if I put myself to it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well you better hope you don't play me, I'd put a huge dent into your ROI [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

The Yugoslavian 10-19-2005 02:59 PM

Re: Isn\'t 60% a low win rate for HU?
 
60% isn't low.

How many hundreds (or thousands) of HU matches have you played?

Yugoslav

davehwm 10-19-2005 03:09 PM

Re: Isn\'t 60% a low win rate for HU?
 
Don't we have a thread on this, like.. everyday?

MegaBet 10-19-2005 03:17 PM

Re: Isn\'t 60% a low win rate for HU?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Don't we have a thread on this, like.. everyday?

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you mean threads on ROI or threads on HU?

Oh wait, it doesn't matter! The answer is "yes" to both!

tom441lbk 10-19-2005 03:21 PM

Re: Isn\'t 60% a low win rate for HU?
 
i was actually wondering this sometime yesterday, as i looked at my stats for the party/skins 11s, my winrate is 64% over around 300 or so, and i think i play very well heads up, and taking account the times i am way outchipped/even and outdrawn

Everyone give a shoutout of their stats/level/sample size, interesting to see, then we can brag about it and try to back it up at future STTFHUC's.


_________________
vOte or die bitches
citanul for pres in '05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.