River Hand #1
 

Villian (BB) is a LAP (47/10/.86) over 35 hands.

Party Poker 2/4 Hold'em (6 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is SB with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP calls, CO calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, BB calls, MP calls, CO calls.

Flop: (8 SB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls, MP folds, CO folds.

Turn: (5 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls.

River: (7 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks...

Good check to induce a bluff or missed value bet?

Re: River Hand #1
 

i like betting, i dont know that we can count on vilain to bet a piece of the board and if he has nothing he may have folded turn, im not too worried about being behind either, i think hell call with more hands we beat than hell bet with, against a very aggressive opponent, this might be better, but im betting here just about every time

Re: River Hand #1
 

bet. too many times LP will check behind their weak hands and busted draws. make 'em pay. value bet.

Re: River Hand #1
 

Looking at the stats provided the check sucks IMO. He's passive postflop but seems to be likely to call down with a wide range. Sure, the read is based on only a few hands, but it makes me more inclined to bet. And I was inclined to bet even without a read.

Re: River Hand #1
 

I like a bet here in a blind battle. He probably calls with a wide range here thinking your FOS on this board but would check through a bunch of hands he would call with.

Re: River Hand #1
 

[ QUOTE ]
Good check to induce a bluff or missed value bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

B.

Re: River Hand #1
 

The only reason I would check here would be to C/R. His numbers indicate he is moderately aggressive, so there is a good chance he'd bet a nine or ten. Still, I think simply betting out is better.

Re: River Hand #1
 

I would bet for value.

Re: River Hand #1
 

this is definetly a missed value bet here. Considering how many hands this guy plays, he is around a neutral aggression, so its not like he is a softie. You'll get called by almost any hand that you have beat that can logically call.

I seriously doubt that he'll bluff this river enough with hands that will fold the river to make it worth the check

Re: River Hand #1
 

missed value bet, to induce a bluff the river card generally has to be a danger card.