Go another bet?
 

30-60 on party....no notes, reads, stats, nothing.

I open raise in the hijack w/ KT. BUtton threebets, heads up.

Flop J93, two clubs. I got zero clubs in my hand. I check/call.

Turn Qc, giving me nutstraight, but putting flush on board.

I checkraise, he threebets, I cap, he calls.

River is offsuit Ace.

I bet, he raises. Threebet or call? I don't consider folding.

Thanks,

Josh

Re: Go another bet?
 

call if you like money

Re: Go another bet?
 

[ QUOTE ]
call if you like money

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Go another bet?
 

You should not of capped the turn, and I dont like the turn checkraise on this board either, since you run the risk of being 3 bet by a better hand or inducing someone to fold a hand drawing close to dead. I would lead out the turn on this board instead of going for the checkraise.

Re: Go another bet?
 

[ QUOTE ]
You should not of capped the turn, and I dont like the turn checkraise on this board either, since you run the risk of being 3 bet by a better hand or inducing someone to fold a hand drawing close to dead. I would lead out the turn on this board instead of going for the checkraise.

[/ QUOTE ]

By leading out on the turn, I still face the prospect of making a hand that's drawing dead (or near-dead) fold. But by check raising, I at least get a big bet out of that situation. Leading out, I don't.

Josh

Re: Go another bet?
 

[ QUOTE ]
You should not of capped the turn

[/ QUOTE ]

honestly how can you type this out?

Re: Go another bet?
 

no idea. still thinking because im befuddled. after he raises the river all i can think about is AKcc.

Re: Go another bet?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You should not of capped the turn

[/ QUOTE ]

honestly how can you type this out?

[/ QUOTE ]
Tell me what Im missing? cuz this is how i see it. The hero checkraises the turn with his straight on this 3 flush board which shows alot of power, and then the villain 3 bets it, I do not see how capping here against an unknown can be a good idea, I think the hero will be shown AcKc or AcTc or Acxc too many times in this situation. What is your take on this, or for that matter anyone else, would everyone cap the turn here? if so then why?

Re: Go another bet?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You should not of capped the turn, and I dont like the turn checkraise on this board either, since you run the risk of being 3 bet by a better hand or inducing someone to fold a hand drawing close to dead. I would lead out the turn on this board instead of going for the checkraise.

[/ QUOTE ]

By leading out on the turn, I still face the prospect of making a hand that's drawing dead (or near-dead) fold. But by check raising, I at least get a big bet out of that situation. Leading out, I don't.

Josh

[/ QUOTE ]
Good point, but checking raising may cost you money if the villain folds when he wouldve called down if you bet out, but I see your point too.

Re: Go another bet?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You should not of capped the turn

[/ QUOTE ]

honestly how can you type this out?

[/ QUOTE ]
Tell me what Im missing? cuz this is how i see it. The hero checkraises the turn with his straight on this 3 flush board which shows alot of power, and then the villain 3 bets it, I do not see how capping here against an unknown can be a good idea, I think the hero will be shown AcKc or AcTc or Acxc too many times in this situation. What is your take on this, or for that matter anyone else, would everyone cap the turn here? if so then why?

[/ QUOTE ]

oh, i was just talking about how you typed out "should not of "