Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   Stars Turbo vs Party (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=347882)

B1GF1SHY 09-30-2005 07:42 PM

Stars Turbo vs Party
 
Was wondering if anyone had any input between the two. While the stars stt is turbo it still seems like a better structure than party. It looks like both take around 40 minutes to play but the stars tournies seem to have more flop play later in the game as opposed to partys all-in or fold structure. Some may say that stars' playerbase is alot better but I can't really tell. Any opinions?

Hendricks433 09-30-2005 08:00 PM

Re: Stars Turbo vs Party
 
Toma(y)to Tomato

niquewon 09-30-2005 08:23 PM

Re: Stars Turbo vs Party
 
I've started to play at Stars to clear some of my backlogged bonuses and I haven't found the $16s or $26s to be any more difficult than the Party $22s.

pokerlaw 09-30-2005 08:29 PM

Re: Stars Turbo vs Party
 
i usually play stars regular but in the last week i've played about 5 turbos (2 1 table, 2 5-table and 1 2-table). By level 4 in one we had played 17 hands (some disconnected, etc) - which sucked. overall i don't really care for party or turbos, but i prefer party since 10 players at a table and more importantly 10 hands/level instead of somewhere between 5-15 (the latter being later on).

gisb0rne 09-30-2005 09:24 PM

Re: Stars Turbo vs Party
 
I like the Stars 25+2's much better than the Party 22's and 33's, even with rakeback. I think they are slightly softer (in my experience) and are faster as well.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.