Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Micro-Limits (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=33)
-   -   ALERT: Poker is a LONG TERM game! (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=337374)

KingOtter 09-15-2005 10:18 AM

ALERT: Poker is a LONG TERM game!
 
I want to say something that bears repeating. We've got a lot of people here that are newer than I am, and I'm not seeing the mantra about poker being a long-term game repeated as much as it was when I first came about.

If you play for 3K hands and win 20BB/100, you are not a winning player.

"Why not?!" You may ask, "Look at that winrate!"

Because 3K hands is short-term. 5k hand is short-term. 10k hands is short-term. 20k hands is short-term in terms of win-rate.

Even at 20K hands, a good run of 50BB over 500 hands could change your win-rate 20% (assuming 1BB/100, at 2BB/100 it goes up 10%).

Crushing a limit isn't about going to any table and walking away with 100BB. Being a winning player doesn't mean that you can win, no matter what. Poker is still gambling. In the long and short of it you still have to get better cards than the other guy, most of the time.

Being a winning player is all about:
1. Adjusting to your opponents play.
2. Making GOOD poker decisions, every time.
3. Putting your opponents in positions where THEY make mistakes.
4. Understanding that a day is short-term... a week is short-term... a month is short-term.
5. Patience.

If you're complaining that you can't beat a limit and you have less than 20k hands as evidence, you're wasting our time.

KO

jrz1972 09-15-2005 10:26 AM

Re: ALERT: Poker is a LONG TERM game!
 
Good post.

Here's something to think about. How many hands do you need to play before you can be 95% confident that your true winrate lies within one BB (one way or the other) of the winrate PokerTracker is reporting?

Assume a standard deviation of 18, and let X be the number of hands you've played (in hundreds). You need to find the X such that your standard error is 0.5.

18/root(X) = 0.5

=> X = 1296.

Remember, that's in hundreds, so you would need to play 129,600 hands just to nail down your winrate to one point either way.

How many people have played 129,600 hands at their current level?

Entity 09-15-2005 10:30 AM

Re: ALERT: Poker is a LONG TERM game!
 
[ QUOTE ]

Assume a standard deviation of 18,

[/ QUOTE ]

That's a monstrous SD. Damn. That's higher than my 10/20 6m SD. :P

Rob

jrz1972 09-15-2005 10:33 AM

Re: ALERT: Poker is a LONG TERM game!
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Assume a standard deviation of 18,

[/ QUOTE ]

That's a monstrous SD. Damn. That's higher than my 10/20 6m SD. :P

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously, that's my std. dev. in .5/1 full ring (~60k hands).

My std. dev. in 6-max is smaller.

Isura 09-15-2005 10:40 AM

Re: ALERT: Poker is a LONG TERM game!
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Assume a standard deviation of 18,

[/ QUOTE ]

That's a monstrous SD. Damn. That's higher than my 10/20 6m SD. :P

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

My SD at 1/2 and 3/6 6max is around 19...

Greg J 09-15-2005 10:55 AM

Re: ALERT: Poker is a LONG TERM game!
 
Nice one KO. Newbies should read this mos def. If we didn't alread have 3 stickies I would sticky this.

PM coming yr way...

KingOtter 09-15-2005 11:06 AM

Re: ALERT: Poker is a LONG TERM game!
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Assume a standard deviation of 18,

[/ QUOTE ]

That's a monstrous SD. Damn. That's higher than my 10/20 6m SD. :P

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously, that's my std. dev. in .5/1 full ring (~60k hands).

My std. dev. in 6-max is smaller.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's mine, too.

KO

Highn 09-15-2005 11:07 AM

Re: ALERT: Poker is a LONG TERM game!
 
Nice post and definately one I'll need to keep in mind in the upcoming downswing(s).

lautzutao 09-15-2005 11:32 AM

Re: ALERT: Poker is a LONG TERM game!
 
Is this the "leet's strike back" post? Sounds like the same kind of whining you're referring to.

numeri 09-15-2005 12:09 PM

Re: ALERT: Poker is a LONG TERM game!
 
Thanks KO. This is good stuff.

I just wanted to say that I didn't really believe the idea about 10k or 20k not being enough until I found myself on a bit of a losing streak. Most of the losing was my own doing, but it easily moved my BB/100 down a point - even after I'd played 15k hands. Then, with some 6-max play (my new drug - mmmm... 6-max...) I'm back up a point. Obviously I have no idea if I'm a winning player if my winrate can fluxuate +/- 1 BB/100 over a few thousand hands.

I just keep telling myself that a downswing is not necessarily an indicator that I'm a losing player, and a big upswing does not mean I'm god's gift to poker.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.