chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs
 

get ready AFC, this is the year.

Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs
 

Can we pick 1 rb and go with that? This tag-team [censored] is pissing me off.

Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs
 

I love it, as a fantasy owner of neither Johnson nor Holmes.

Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs
 

[ QUOTE ]
Can we pick 1 rb and go with that? This tag-team [censored] is pissing me off.

[/ QUOTE ]

Terrible idea.

Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs
 

RB by committe <3

Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs
 

haha yea me too, but they expected this so thats why I didn't pick Priest when I had the chance, I took Shawn alexander for the 3rd back taken.

Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs
 

If I'm not mistaken wasn't it a couple years ago the Chief's defence was decent in the first couple games then they were finally discovered, even though they had one of the best records in the AFC that year, they ended up losing in the first round.

Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs
 

[ QUOTE ]
If I'm not mistaken wasn't it a couple years ago the Chief's defence was decent in the first couple games then they were finally discovered, even though they had one of the best records in the AFC that year, they ended up losing in the first round.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep, that was just 2003. 13-3. And they lost to the Colts in the second round (They had a bye for the first, I think). But the defense today was better than decent, as far as I'm concerned.

Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs
 

Two Words: Colts. Patriots.

Re: chieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefs
 

[ QUOTE ]
get ready AFC, this is the year.

[/ QUOTE ]

Perhaps not.