Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Probability (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   How much of poker is luck? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=332970)

bluechip270 09-09-2005 03:08 AM

How much of poker is luck?
 
Does anyone know the percentage of how much luck is involved in NL Texas Holdem? For example, Brunson said a tourney is 80%Luck and 20% skill and I am just wondering what that number is for cash games?

Thanks for all the help

Mr. Curious 09-09-2005 03:25 AM

Re: How much of poker is luck?
 
Poker is 100% luck and 100% skill.

TheRegulat0r 09-10-2005 12:50 AM

Re: How much of poker is luck?
 
some of my none-gambling friends always try to tell me poker is all luck because whoever gets the best cards wins. My reply is "good poker is winning the most when you have the best hand and losing the least when you don't." They usually concede after that.

As your number of hands increases, the accuracy of your win or lose rate calculations becomes more accurate. Theoretically "luck," aka variance becomes minimal once you have a very large sample size.

SheetWise 09-10-2005 01:06 AM

Stu Unger
 
Does anyone remember how many times Stu entered the WSOP? I know he won it three times -- how many times did he enter?

davet 09-10-2005 01:49 AM

Re: Stu Unger
 

Three.

He won 10 out of 30 major tourneys.

KKbluff 09-10-2005 05:38 AM

Re: How much of poker is luck?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Poker is 100% luck and 1000% skill.

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP

AaronBrown 09-10-2005 10:34 AM

Re: How much of poker is luck?
 
It depends. One hand is all luck, in a lifetime of play luck is only a minor factor.

Over 100 hands, a typical good player might have a standard deviation equal to 10 times their expected win rate. So over 10,000 hands, you could say luck and skill are about equally important. But this depends on the skill of the players and the game type.

Games with high blinds and antes relative to stacks and limits increase the importance of luck. This is true in late stages of tournaments for example.

No limit games increase the importance of luck in the sense that results are determined by fewer hands than in limit play. On the other hand, no limit also increases the scope for skill.

Good players increase the importance of skill, bad players make luck more important (which helps them).

Quicksilvre 09-10-2005 05:26 PM

Re: Stu Unger
 
[ QUOTE ]
Three.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope--he was 9th in 1990 and 264th in 1996. There are probably a few other times as well.

SheetWise 09-10-2005 07:05 PM

Re: Stu Unger
 
Entered five times? Can anyone update that?
So far he's in the money 4 out of 5 in WSOP ...

Quicksilvre 09-10-2005 09:04 PM

Re: Stu Unger
 
I'm sure that he entered other times as well. For example, he won the Super Bowl of Poker in '83, '88, and '89, so he'd probably be lucid enough to enter the WSOP in those years as well.

(That's just a stab in the dark...but I have heard that he entered at least most years in the 80s)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.