Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Probability (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   Craps (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=291209)

bosulli 07-12-2005 06:43 AM

Craps
 
I am having a debate with a non-gambling co-worker about craps.

He believes that betting the “don’t pass line” is better odds than then the “pass line” line. I have always believed they are the same odds.

I could figure it out if I remembered the rules, but I have not played craps since I discovered poker. Can anyone help me out with the odds?

MickeyHoldem 07-12-2005 07:57 AM

Re: Craps
 
The pass line wins ~49.29% of the time and loses ~50.71%
this gives the house a 1.41% edge

The don't pass line wins less... ~47.93% and loses ~49.29%
because the don't pass line pushes on a 12... the house edge is only ~1.36%

this makes the don't pass line a slightly better wager.

PE101 07-12-2005 10:23 AM

Re: Craps
 
MickeyHoldem is right.

In my opionion, it's more fun to bet with the table.

I'll give up the small difference to not be the bad guy at the table. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

shday 07-12-2005 01:02 PM

Re: Craps
 
[ QUOTE ]
The pass line wins ~49.29% of the time and loses ~50.71% this gives the house a 1.41% edge
The don't pass line wins less... ~47.93% and loses ~49.29% because the don't pass line pushes on a 12... the house edge is only ~1.36%
this makes the don't pass line a slightly better wager.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't think there was that much of a difference. Check out the rec.gambling FAQ:

http://www.conjelco.com/faq/craps.html

It gives 1.4141% and 1.4026% for pass and don't pass, respectively.

MickeyHoldem 07-12-2005 04:31 PM

Re: Craps
 
Yes, my calculation for the don't pass is off... Don't pass should win 949/1925 for 0.492987 and a house edge of 1.402597%

Quick replies with 2 kids screaming for more fruit loops should be avoided.

SheetWise 07-12-2005 07:36 PM

Re: Craps
 
But you have failed to adjust expectation for the buying or laying of odds. Since we know the game has a negative expectation, our optimal strategy is to minimize loss. If you can minimize expected loss based on handle by a factor of 2, it makes other variables (such as dealer error) more interesting (strategically).

SheetWise

bosulli 07-28-2005 12:34 AM

Re: Craps
 
That answers my question. If you are not into splitting atoms, then the odds are the same.

Appreciate the quality info, and sorry for my belated appreciation.

SheetWise 07-28-2005 01:03 PM

Re: Craps
 
I saw your post come up again -
I think it's worth noting (after reading comments made two weeks ago) that while expectations are very close -- and it may be more fun to be on the front side -- dealers will make many, many more errors on the back side. Especially rookies. Reducing your expectation by 2/3 when laying double odds -- you get to about .48 -- if you can get one error per hour, the game can have a positive expectation. With 3-4 players per side, no boxman, and an inside stick -- sometimes you can get 5-10 errors per hour. Throw in a few two ways after the first error, and the rate sometimes increases (on the back side - because it is far less obvious).


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.