$215 SNG level 3 hand
 

No relevant reads...

Comments? My results and thoughts later...

***** Hand History for Game 2203388100 *****
50/100 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (NL) (Tournament 13073260) - Mon Jun 13 22:22:46 EDT 2005
Table Table 11131 (Real Money) -- Seat 5 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: mush00 (795)
Seat 2: Mooon33 (570)
Seat 3: Jints91 (840)
Seat 4: ineimesis (652)
Seat 5: STOP_Drawing (1540)
Seat 6: Maxrob (755)
Seat 7: DarrenX (955)
Seat 8: projecteros (1163)
Seat 9: Thomas_007 (1835)
Seat 10: Munchausen1 (895)
Maxrob posts small blind (25)
DarrenX posts big blind (50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to DarrenX [ 9d, 7d ]
projecteros calls (50)
Thomas_007 folds.
Munchausen1 folds.
mush00 calls (50)
Mooon33 folds.
Jints91 folds.
ineimesis folds.
STOP_Drawing folds.
Maxrob calls (25)
DarrenX checks.
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 6s, Td, 6d ]
Maxrob checks.
DarrenX checks.
projecteros checks.
mush00 bets (200)
Maxrob folds.
DarrenX calls (200)
projecteros folds.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ Ac ]
DarrenX bets (705)
DarrenX is all-In.

Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
 

Who's up for splitting the SNG forum into different levels? I would never make this play even at the $55s, but it may work at the higher levels.

Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
 

I'm with you, but then again I'm down at the 11s and 22s, so my advice is probably useless on this. As far as the actual hand, I can't see myself making the move either. I've missed the turn, probably a check fold, unless he bets small or checks fearing the 6 (which I doubt).

Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
 

Well, considering villain limped from EP on level 3 with only t795, I don't really think you can put him on a 6 or an ace. The only other possible hand I could see him having is a pair of tens. Some people MIGHT limp with this in this spot (not me). Possibly 77-99.

So I think that given that you could have had anything playing from the blinds, my guess is that this play will work quite often. Especially since I view his flop bet as a sign of weakness really.

What happened?

Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
 

[ QUOTE ]
No relevant reads...

Comments? My results and thoughts later...

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't like it. Agree with the check, but I prefer push or fold when it's back to me. By getting tricky you give him a free card to hit his overs on the turn, in which case you may now get a call. If he has a PP<TT he folds the flop if you CR him all-in and he's going nowhere if he has a 6 either way. So I'm not sure what extra FE you get by the SNG.

Anyhow, I've probably missed something so looking forward to your explanation....

Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
 

Again...are you trying to lose? I see no reason to get involved with a crappy flush draw in the early levels when a pair is already on the board.

Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
 

I assume you were planning on pushing any turn when you called the flop. Is that true?

I don't think it is good, but not terrible. The problem is the Villian's stack is too short.

His bet on the turn was either a 6, a Ten, a Draw, Overs (an Ace?), or a complete bluff. Considering his stack and what is in the pot he will call with most of those.

Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
 

I don't mean to be saying that even he had a bigger stack you should necessarily make this bluff. You gotta have good timing for bluffs and it's hard to endorse one out of context.

Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
 

[ QUOTE ]
Again...are you trying to lose? I see no reason to get involved with a crappy flush draw in the early levels when a pair is already on the board.

[/ QUOTE ]

You know he has an inside str8 draw too right? And that big flop bet is not coming from a FH or trips....

Your bluff will be called by A-10, but K-10, Q-10 and J-10 should fold.

Re: $215 SNG level 3 hand
 

215 is my regular game and I'd never make this call. In fact, I wouldn't make this call at any limit.