When you do not want overcalls
 

SSH concept I haven't used:
When was the last time you raised the river with a marginal hand because you believed you might have had the bettor beaten, but you wanted someone behind to fold a better hand?
I don't think I've ever done this. It's been applied to me though. I once folded a straight because a set in front of me raised on a flush board.

Re: When you do not want overcalls
 

This is not something you should do often. You should try it only if you have one HELL of a read on yr opponent and they pot is huge. Even then, it's risky.

Re: When you do not want overcalls
 

I mentioned this concept in this post. I thought a river fold was in order, but I argued that a raise is better than a call for these reasons.

I should add that few if any agreed with me.

Re: When you do not want overcalls
 

I can't think of a single time I've ever applied it.

If the pot's worth it and you think you can beat the bettor and you also think that others behind you might fold a better hand than you for 2 bets.

Problem is, most bad players who have gone that far with their hand are bad enough that they are gonna call two more big bets on the end. So yes, you need some very strong reads and the pot has to be worth the risk (though the bigger the pot, the more likely your oppoents are going to call two bets).

Sometimes, if there's a straight on the board and one of your opponent bets, it might be worth a raise if you have a donk behind you who won't notice the straight (so you're only splitting with one person). Though if someone can make a higher straight with a hole card... you're really gonna be hurting.

But if the board is AKQJT and there's no flush, you should definitely raise and hope someone is dumb.

Re: When you do not want overcalls
 

I have tried this concept only once when I was playing .50 1.

Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (10 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is BB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. MP2 posts a blind of $0.5.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP1 calls, MP2 (poster) checks, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Hero calls, UTG+1 calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls.

Flop: (10.50 SB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks, <font color="#CC3333">CO bets</font>, Hero calls, UTG+1 calls, MP1 folds, MP2 folds.

Turn: (6.75 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, CO checks.

River: (6.75 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">CO bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, UTG+1 folds, CO calls.

Final Pot: 10.75 BB

My thinking was that the CO had a Ace or even weaker like K high and was trying to buy the pot on the river. Co was a aggressive player so his turn check meant he has a weak hand and I put him on overcards. I didn't want a overcaller here and I was pretty confident my Ace was good on this board against the CO, worst case would be that Co had a Ace also and we chop if he calls.

So my raise here was to make UTG+1 fold because I do not want to be overcalled on this board.

I remember this hand well because I have posted it before on a different forum.


Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
Hero has Qh Ac (two pair, sixes and threes).
CO has 2h 2c (two pair, sixes and threes).
Outcome: Hero wins 10.75 BB. </font>

Re: When you do not want overcalls
 

He did not call your river raise with 3-Two Pair with his pair of deuces being counterfeited.

I [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Party Poker.

Re: When you do not want overcalls
 

deleted

Re: When you do not want overcalls
 

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Huh, this is NOT a situation where you do not want overcalls. You DO want UTG+1 to overcall here. The only hands that beat you are JJ-AA, a 3 or a 6. I don't really think UTG+1 has JJ-AA or a 3, you would have heard from him at some point. I don't think those hands fold for two bets either, a 3 or a 6 would certainly not.
It is a typical example of where you DO want overcalls. CO could be bluffing but if he does, he's not gonna pay you off but he will raise with a 6. UTG+1 will call with many hands that you beat for one BB, he's not gonna fold a hand that beats you for two.

Re: When you do not want overcalls
 

[ QUOTE ]
The only hands that beat you are JJ-AA, a 3 or a 6. I don't really think UTG+1 has JJ-AA or a 3, you would have heard from him at some point. I don't think those hands fold for two bets either, a 3 or a 6 would certainly not.


[/ QUOTE ]

you sure you don't want the donk behind you to fold 44 or 55?? they beat you as does 77-99 to your list, and you sure wouldn't mind folding an Aout either

Re: When you do not want overcalls
 

you are wrong, you never want someone to overcall if the only hand you have is ACE high.

many hands beat me here beside JJ-AA, how about 44-AA all have me beat here.

Getting someone to fold another ace is beneficial to you and give you a bigger share of the pot also.